...
...
Next Story

Court refrains Chandigarh administration from removing encroachment by GMSH-16 chemist till Jan 10

The chemist had approached the court of additional district judge Beri after the court of civil judge junior division Jaspreet Singh Minhas had ruled that there was no ground to interfere with the show-cause notice issued by the UT administration.

Published on: Jan 6, 2023, 11:42:58 IST
Advertisement

The court of additional district judge Rajeev K Beri on Thursday restrained the UT administration from acting upon its December 22 order for removal of encroachment by the chemist at Government Multi Specialty Hospital (GMSH), Sector 16, till January 10.

The court of additional district judge Rajeev K Beri on Thursday restrained the UT administration from acting upon its December 22 order for removal of encroachment by the chemist at Government Multi Specialty Hospital (GMSH), Sector 16, till January 10. (HT File)
The court of additional district judge Rajeev K Beri on Thursday restrained the UT administration from acting upon its December 22 order for removal of encroachment by the chemist at Government Multi Specialty Hospital (GMSH), Sector 16, till January 10. (HT File)

The chemist had approached the court of additional district judge Beri after the court of civil judge junior division Jaspreet Singh Minhas had ruled that there was no ground to interfere with the show-cause notice issued by the UT administration.

Chemist Sunil Kumar, through his counsel Munish Dewan, had moved application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering in his possession over the rented premises in dispute and from forcibly entering in his possession over it while further seeking staying of operation of the order issued on December 22 during pendency of the appeal.

The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants are threatening to enter into the possession of plaintiff over the rented shop the lease of which is valid till February 17, 2024. They also are threatening to enter in such possession of the plaintiff on the basis of the December 22 order.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe