...
...
Next Story

Few takers for UPPCL’s one-time settlement scheme

UPPCL, in October, 2021, announced the one time settlement scheme, seeking to waive off 100% surcharge (interest) payable on electricity dues, provided consumers cleared all their arrears. The scheme was extended at least thrice before it finally came to an end on January 31. However, most defaulters anticipate that the next government would waive off arrears and provide free power.

Published on: Feb 9, 2022, 00:36:17 IST
Advertisement

Lucknow: The UP Power Corporation Ltd’s (UPPCL) one-time settlement scheme to recover ₹27,000 crore electricity dues failed to evoke the ‘desired’ response from defaulters who chose not to clear their pending electricity bills in anticipation that the next government would waive off arrears and provide free power, people aware of the issue revealed.

Arrears to the tune of  ₹6,000 crore are collectively pending against more than 1.50 lakh consumers. (Pic for representation)
Arrears to the tune of ₹6,000 crore are collectively pending against more than 1.50 lakh consumers. (Pic for representation)

“As all political parties are promising free power and waiver of arrears to voters, most of the defaulters apparently ignored our OTS because they were convinced that any government that came to power after the assembly polls in March would waive off their dues,” a top UPPCL official said.

UPPCL, in October, 2021, announced the OTS seeking to waive off 100% surcharge (interest) payable on electricity dues, provided consumers cleared all their arrears. The scheme that was applicable to farmers, domestic and commercial consumers was to be in effect between October 21 and November 30.

The scheme, was however, extended at least thrice before it finally came to an end on January 31 after the corporation made a lot of publicity to encourage defaulters to opt for the OTS.

It is revealed that arrears to the tune of ₹6,000 crore are collectively pending against more than 1.50 lakh consumers and individually each of them owes more than ₹1 lakh to the corporation.

Another senior UPPCL official said that not only did the free power and dues waiver promises being made by political parties adversely impact the OTS but the corporation’s inability to carry out raids and snap connections due to the polls was also a major reason for the failure of the OTS.

“OTS gives desired results only when defaulters have the fear of their power supply being snapped if they do not pay bills. But the consumers this time knew the government-owned corporation could not afford to launch a disconnection drive till elections were over in March, after which they believed the new government would waive off dues and start providing free power as being promised to them,” he said.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Brajendra K Parashar

Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks