...
...
Next Story

HC issues notice to RBI, NPCI over recipient-side e-payment control

A division bench of Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Manjive Shukla passed the order on August 24 on the PIL filed by Lucknow-based advocate Anupriya Agrawal. The petitioner has sought directions to the RBI to issue appropriate guidelines, within two months, providing a mandatory “Accept/Decline” option before an incoming payment is credited to the recipient’s bank account.

Published on: Aug 26, 2026, 21:40:45 IST
Advertisement

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has issued notices to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) on a public interest litigation (PIL) questioning the absence of a recipient-side mechanism in the electronic payment system that allows an account holder to accept or decline an incoming transaction before the money is credited to their account.

Recipient-side mechanism in the electronic payment system allows an account holder to accept or decline an incoming transaction before the money is credited to their account. (For representation)
Recipient-side mechanism in the electronic payment system allows an account holder to accept or decline an incoming transaction before the money is credited to their account. (For representation)

A division bench of Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Manjive Shukla passed the order on August 24 on the PIL filed by Lucknow-based advocate Anupriya Agrawal.

The petitioner has sought directions to the RBI to issue appropriate guidelines, within two months, providing a mandatory “Accept/Decline” option before an incoming payment is credited to the recipient’s bank account.

Petitioner’s counsel Saksham Agrawal submitted that the existing digital payment architecture substantially facilitates the initiation and authentication of a transaction by the payer, while the recipient is ordinarily not provided with a corresponding transaction-level mechanism to indicate whether they wish to receive a particular incoming payment.

Such asymmetry, he argued, warrants examination from the standpoint of customer protection, financial autonomy, privacy and prevention of misuse of electronic payment systems.

The Union of India, through the secretary, ministry of finance; the RBI, through its governor; and the NPCI, through its managing director, have been made opposite parties in the petition.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe