...
...
Next Story

Yet another colourless head

As has traditionally been the case, the announcement of a new United Nations secretary-general gives grounds to speculate as to what could have been. The UN, for

Published on: Oct 07, 2016 09:45 AM IST
Advertisement

As has traditionally been the case, the announcement of a new United Nations secretary-general gives grounds to speculate as to what could have been. The UN, for all its many faults, still symbolically represents the Kantian ideal — a single worldwide entity dedicated to the peaceful and negotiated solution of disputes between nations and larger global concerns. The new secretary-general, former Portuguese prime minister Antonio Guterres, is a more political animal than Ban Ki-moon, the former South Korean diplomat he replaces. But otherwise he is cut from the same cloth that most UN heads are. He comes from a small country, has a record of not saying or doing anything remotely controversial and, finally, there is a consensus among the major states that he will not stir the UN’s stagnant waters.

HT Image
HT Image

The UN’s effectiveness waxes and wanes on exactly this point: How strong is the consensus on international issues among the great powers. Increasingly, this consensus includes countries like India and Brazil as well as the traditional permanent five Security Council members. The UN was remarkably effective in the immediate years after the Cold War, thanks to the bonhomie that existed between Washington, Moscow and Beijing. Today, the world is criss-crossed with fault-lines. The result is international agreement by the lowest common denominator and the selection of colourless UN heads. It would be nice to think that in some capitals around the world there would be a sense that a dynamic statesman might be what a system in crisis needed. The opposite happens in the UN. The worse the state of the world, the less willing the international community is to choose someone who could push them into finding solutions.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON