...
...
Next Story

Election Commission's SIR exercise identifies just 1,600 foreigners on voter lists in six states

The Election Commission said it did not ask states to collect separate data on suspected foreign nationals, with some officials citing gaps in record-keeping.

Updated on: Oct 29, 2026, 07:09:52 IST
Advertisement

When the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced the special intensive revision in Bihar last year, it mentioned the “inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants” as one of the motivations for the exercise.

In Karnataka officials 716 foreign nationals for the removal. (Hindustan Times)
In Karnataka officials 716 foreign nationals for the removal. (Hindustan Times)

Yet, in at least six states where SIR was completed or is ongoing, the number of suspected foreign nationals – roughly around 1,600 at least – detected till now is minuscule compared to the electorate and the scale of deletions, HT has found. In these states, the size of the electorate is 98.6 million.

Detections in Karnataka

In Karnataka, where SIR has deleted 9.97 million names in the final rolls, the authorities identified 716 foreign nationals for removal, including 545 Nepalese citizens in Bengaluru North, said an official from the state Chief Electoral Officer’s (CEO) office.

Also read: Karnataka SIR: Final roll today amid row over exclusion of 10.8mn from draft list

In Dakshina Kannada, electoral officials said, 40 foreign nationals were detected, including 17 from Nepal, six each from Australia and the United States, five from Canada, two from Britain, and one each from the Netherlands, South Africa, Ireland and Norway.

Uttara Kannada, as per district officials, had 22 detections, involving citizens of Nepal, Pakistan, the United States and Bangladesh. In Udupi, 47 foreign nationals from countries including Nepal, the United States, Britain, France and Canada were detected, district election officerTK Swaroopa told reporters.

“Some people who possessed voter identity cards could not provide details of other documents, including school certificates and property records, during verification,” said an officer familiar with the exercise.

HT spoke to the CEOs of 26states and Union territories where SIR was completed or draft rolls published. Officials from 11 states responded. Six gave a count of suspected foreigners. Four said they didn’t maintain the data. Odisha said it found such cases but did not record a figure. “We did find suspected foreign nationals on the rolls but didn’t keep any figures,” an Odisha state official said.

ECI said it never asked states for this data. “States were not asked to collect this data separately. We also don’t have combined or state-wise data on this. If any such cases came up, they were placed under the ‘Others’ category in ASDDO. But ECI has not asked them to provide these details,” a senior ECI official said.

Also read: All SIR decisions unanimous, Form 6 not amended: Election Commission to Supreme Court

Findings in other states

In Jharkhand, where draft rolls were published on August 5 and final rolls are scheduled on November 30, officials identified three foreign nationals – all from Afghanistan, saida state CEO official.

The draft roll had 22.1 million names, dropping roughly 4.36 million names from the pre-SIR roll of 26.46 million people.

In Meghalaya, two men of Nepalese origin, both married to Indian women, were found on the rolls, said state CEO BDR Tiwari. The two were found at Mawsynram in East Khasi Hills.

“We found two Nepalese men on the rolls. They were immediately removed and the matter has been referred to the home department,” said Tiwari. The final roll, published on October 26, comprised 2.18 million names, dropping 165,682 names in all.

In Kerala, authorities detected around 500 people who held foreign citizenship but were still on the rolls, said a senior state CEO official. The state’s final roll, published on February 21, comprised 26.95 million names, dropping 897,211names in all.

In Goa, authorities detected 419 suspected foreign passport holders, said state CEO Sanjay Goel.

The state’s final roll, published on February 21, comprised 1.06 million names, dropping 127,468 names in all.

Mizoram reported no such cases. The state’s final roll, published on September 7, comprised 835,000 names, dropping 39,000 names in all. CEO Garima Gupta said that the draft roll showed no evidence of foreign nationals being enrolled.

Also read: Jharkhand assembly to hold special session in Nov, SIR among issues to be deliberated

States that did not maintain the data

Officials in the CEO of Punjab, Delhi, Uttarakhand and Telangana said they did not maintain this data. Punjab CEO Anindita Mitra said, “We only categorised electors under the ASDD categories. This data was not collected.”

Uttarakhand CEO BVRC Purushottam questioned whether it was even possible. “How could we collect this data? This is beyond the scope of election officials,” he said.

In Delhi, a senior official at the CEO office said, “The CEO office hasn’t received any such input from DEOs. At this stage, we don’t have this data.”

Also read: Delhi SIR: 94% of voters flagged over discrepancies cleared for final roll

ECI’s stated reason for the revision

On June 24, 2025, ECI announced the beginning of SIR in Bihar. “Various reasons such as rapid urbanization, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants have necessitated the conduct of an intensive revision so as to ensure integrity and preparation of error-free electoral rolls,” it said in a press note.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many suspected foreign nationals were detected in at least six states?

The report says roughly 1,600 suspected foreign nationals at least were detected in six states where SIR was completed or ongoing.

How many foreign nationals did authorities identify for removal in Karnataka?

Authorities identified 716 foreign nationals for removal in Karnataka, including 545 Nepalese citizens in Bengaluru North.

Did the Election Commission of India collect state-wise data on suspected foreign nationals?

The ECI said it did not ask states to collect this data separately and did not have combined or state-wise data on it.

What reasons did the ECI give for conducting the intensive revision in Bihar?

The ECI cited rapid urbanization, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths and the inclusion of foreign illegal immigrants’ names as reasons for the revision.
Powered ByAsk HT
 
Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks