...
...
Next Story

‘Mining no crime under PMLA’: HC restrains ED action

The ED had filed its Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) last September against contractors and other suppliers of machineries, including excavators allegedly over illegal sand mining case.

Updated on: Jul 18, 2024 08:28 AM IST
Advertisement

Chennai: The Madras High Court has ordered the Enforcement Directorate (ED) not to take any further action on a sand mining case in Tamil Nadu stating that mining is not a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money Launderig Act (PMLA).

The ED had filed its Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) last September against contractors and other suppliers of machineries, including excavators allegedly over illegal sand mining case. (HT PHOTO)
The ED had filed its Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) last September against contractors and other suppliers of machineries, including excavators allegedly over illegal sand mining case. (HT PHOTO)

The ED had filed its Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) last September against contractors and other suppliers of machineries, including excavators allegedly over illegal sand mining case.

A division bench of Justices M S Ramesh and Sunder Mohan passed the order on Tuesday, on a batch of petitions filed by among others, the contractors — K Rethinam, P Karikalan and S Ramachandran — seeking to quash the ECIR stating that the central agency lacks jurisdiction.

“The respondents (ED) shall not continue further action pursuant to the ECIR in so far as the petitioners are concerned till such time the statutory and other requirements that we have pointed out above are complied with,” the court said in its order.

The court also quashed ED orders provisionally attaching the properties of the contractors. “We are thus of the view that unless an information with regard to any case in the scheduled offence is registered and such an offence has generated proceeds of crime, which is dealt with by the petitioners, no action can be initiated,” the court said. “As stated earlier, the materials collected and the reasons shown in the Provisional Attachment Order, even if accepted to be true only suggests that the respondents have unearthed large scale illegal sand mining and that may have generated illegal money.”

On Tuesday, the Court cited Supreme Court’s judgements that in the absence of any scheduled offence that had resulted in proceeds of crime, ED cannot assume jurisdiction to initiate action under PMLA. The court ordered ED not to take any action against the petitioners unless a scheduled offence is registered. “One cannot put the cart before the horse,” the court said. “Therefore, we are of the view that the impugned actions, which are challenged in the Writ Petitions, are without jurisdiction and they are liable to be quashed and as such, stand quashed.”

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Divya Chandrababu

Divya Chandrababu is an award-winning political and human rights journalist based in Chennai, India. Divya is presently Assistant Editor of the Hindustan Times where she covers Tamil Nadu & Puducherry. She started her career as a broadcast journalist at NDTV-Hindu where she anchored and wrote prime time news bulletins. Later, she covered politics, development, mental health, child and disability rights for The Times of India. Divya has been a journalism fellow for several programs including the Asia Journalism Fellowship at Singapore and the KAS Media Asia- The Caravan for narrative journalism. Divya has a master's in politics and international studies from the University of Warwick, UK. As an independent journalist Divya has written for Indian and foreign publications on domestic and international affairs.

Check India news real-time updates, latest news on Hindustan Times and more across India.
Check India news real-time updates, latest news on Hindustan Times and more across India.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe