Sign in

On first day, CJI Surya Kant cancels same-day mention practice

Justice Surya Kant said the court’s time should not be consumed by mentioning requests, and that lawyers must adhere to the procedure he spelt out.

Updated on: Nov 25, 2025, 05:05:43 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

On his first day as Chief Justice of India (CJI), Justice Surya Kant signalled a shift in the Supreme Court’s morning routine, announcing that the practice of listing matters on the same day upon oral mentioning would no longer be entertained, except in cases involving personal liberty or imminent execution.

Justice Kant’s first-day directive signals a return to a stricter, procedure-driven system for urgent listing. (PTI)
Justice Kant’s first-day directive signals a return to a stricter, procedure-driven system for urgent listing. (PTI)

Addressing a group of lawyers gathered in his courtroom seeking urgent dates for their matters, CJI Kant said the era of daily queues for oral mentioning must end. “I had said it sitting in Court No. 2 that unless someone’s liberty is involved or a death sentence is to be executed, I will never allow listing of a case on the same day. This practice has to be discouraged,” he told the Bar.

Also Read | Calling failed relationship rape trivialises offence: SC

All requests for urgent listing must now be routed through a written letter of urgency, he clarified. Such letters, he said, would first be examined by the registrar (judicial administration) before being placed before the CJI for administrative directions. “All of you give a letter of urgency to the registrar. The officer will examine them and bring such requests to the CJI. Wherever there are adequate reasons, cases will be listed immediately,” he added.

Justice Kant said the court’s time should not be consumed by mentioning requests, and that lawyers must adhere to the procedure he spelt out. The direction marks a break from the practice of his immediate predecessor, Justice Bhushan R Gavai, who devoted 10-15 minutes every morning to hearing oral mentions — a system he defended in an interview to HT last week, saying it helped address lawyers’ grievances about delays in listing.

Also Read | Justice Surya Kant takes oath as 53rd Chief Justice of India

Justice Kant has long expressed reservations about same-day listing. In September, he remarked that he would not order such listings “unless someone is about to be hanged,” pointing to the intense workload and sleep deprivation judges face. “Unless someone’s liberty is at stake, we will not list it the same day,” he said on September 24.

Mentioning is a long-standing practice in the Supreme Court, where advocates bring up cases for urgent listing or directions before the day’s regular hearings begin. The process has undergone changes under different CJIs.

On August 6, then-CJI Gavai barred designated senior advocates from mentioning matters before the first court. Some judges, including Justice Vikram Nath, have since begun following the same practice.

Earlier, former CJI Sanjiv Khanna had done away with oral mentioning altogether, directing lawyers to move a letter before the registrar, who would then place it before the CJI during lunch recess. His predecessor, former CJI Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, had introduced a structured system for urgent listing. The June 2023 circular assured a fast-track process for listing of fresh matters filed in the top court. Matters filed before Tuesday of every week will now get a guaranteed listing on the coming Monday while matters filed later in the week (Wednesday to Friday) will get automatically listed on the coming Friday.

Justice Kant’s first-day directive signals a return to a stricter, procedure-driven system for urgent listing, aimed at reducing morning congestion in the CJI’s court and ensuring that only genuinely urgent matters receive priority.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather major national developments and Karnataka Bandh LIVE.