Parliamentary panel slams Allahabad Uni over SC, ST exclusion, vacant reserved posts
A report was submitted by a 30-member panel led by BJP lawmaker Faggan Singh Kulaste in the Lok Sabha and laid on the table of the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday
New Delhi: The Parliamentary Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) has pulled up the University of Allahabad for what it termed an “unfair” and “lackadaisical” approach towards reserved category candidates, expressing dismay over unfilled SC and ST vacancies, the rejection of 14 candidates as not found suitable (NFS) in the last three years, and the absence of any SC or ST representation in the university’s Executive Council.

The committee called for structural reforms to address persistent representation gaps in faculty recruitment, governance and non-teaching posts.
According to the report submitted by a 30-member panel led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lawmaker Faggan Singh Kulaste in the Lok Sabha and laid on the table of the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, SC and ST officials were absent from Allahabad University’s Executive Council (EC), the principal executive body that runs the university and implements its policies, in four of the last ten years.
The report described this as “systemic inequity” and “structural exclusion” of SC and ST communities from decision-making, shaping recruitment, promotions and grievance redressal, thereby undermining universities’ credibility as inclusive institutions.
The panel, in its report examining the role of autonomous bodies and higher education institutions in the socio-economic development of SCs and STs and the implementation of the reservation policy—with specific reference to the University of Allahabad—“strongly” recommended that the Union education ministry and the University Grants Commission (UGC) frame a policy to ensure mandatory SC and ST representation in the Executive Council of all central universities, calling it a “long-pending legitimate expectation” that must be met through “earnest efforts”.
The committee said the absence of SC and ST members in the EC allows reserved posts to remain vacant or be diverted, with unchecked NFS decisions undermining UGC norms.
It expressed concern that 14 SC and ST candidates were declared NFS in the last three years — including nine out of 28 faculty posts in one cycle — calling it a “lax attitude” to faculty recruitment towards SC and ST candidates that “undermines reservation policy and keeps reserved posts vacant”.
The committee said SC and ST candidates are often declared NFS despite meeting eligibility norms, rejecting the university and ministry’s claim of a “lack of sufficient suitable candidates” and flagging biased assessments by selection committees that deprive them of faculty positions.
To address this, the panel recommended mandatory reporting and review of all NFS decisions, requiring universities to place on record clear justifications for rejecting candidates. It also suggested reconstituting selection committees with greater representation of SC and ST experts, including at the chairperson level, and using permissible relaxations more proactively to fill reserved posts.
On faculty strength, the committee observed that out of 428 faculty appointments made over the last decade at Allahabad University, only 53 SC and 24 ST candidates — 12.3% and 5.6% respectively — were selected.
Stressing the urgency of corrective action, the panel directed that all existing vacant faculty posts be filled within three months and that no SC or ST faculty position should remain vacant for more than six months under any circumstances.
In non-teaching posts, the committee found shortfalls of two in Group ‘A’, eight in Group ‘B’ and 38 in Group ‘C’ posts, and criticised University of Allahabad for its “lackadaisical approach”. It called on the ministry to prepare a time-bound action plan and report progress to Parliament, warning that continued delays would defeat the very purpose of reservation in higher education.
The University of Allahabad is the fourth oldest and among the three most popular universities in India in terms of students’ choice for undergraduate admissions. It has 11 constituent colleges in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.
ABOUT THE AUTHORSanjay MauryaSanjay Maurya is a Principal Correspondent with Hindustan Times, where he covers education, with a focus on school and higher education, competitive examinations, education policy and governance. Working as part of the National Bureau, he is based in New Delhi and reports on the Ministry of Education and covers various statutory bodies like UGC, AICTE and NCTE and autonomous bodies like CBSE and NCERT. His reporting also tracks the implementation of key government reforms and policies from school education to higher education including in IITs, NITs, IIMs, central and state universities, and their impact on students and educational institutions. His reporting on the irregularities and rushed implementation of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for evaluation of Class 12 board exams 2026, triggered administrative action, leading to the transfer of the board's two senior-most officials and the constitution of a committee to probe alleged irregularities in procurement process of the system. He joined Hindustan Times in December 2024. Prior to that, he had a three-year stint at Careers360, where he reported on school and higher education, entrance examinations, admissions, rankings and various education policies involving universities and professional education bodies. Over the years, Maurya has reported extensively on major developments in India's education sector, including the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, changes in school education, higher education regulation, and the evolution of entrance examinations such as NEET, JEE and CUET. He regularly produces data-driven and explanatory stories based on government documents, parliamentary proceedings, court records and official data. His focus remains on helping readers understand how education policies and institutional decisions affect millions of students, teachers and educational institutions across the country.Read More

E-Paper


