New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Jan 20, 2020-Monday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

Monday, Jan 20, 2020
Home / India News / Sajjan Kumar accuses CBI of tutoring witness

Sajjan Kumar accuses CBI of tutoring witness

The fact that the witness was giving information contrary to his police statements in 1985 point to him being tutored, Kumar’s counsel said

india Updated: Apr 10, 2019 09:50 IST
Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India
New Delhi
The case was transferred from the Karkardooma court to the Patiala House court by the Delhi High Court, which had directed the district judge to video record the proceedings.
The case was transferred from the Karkardooma court to the Patiala House court by the Delhi High Court, which had directed the district judge to video record the proceedings.(PTI)
         

Former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar, serving life term in Tihar jail, accused the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) before a Delhi court, on Tuesday, of tutoring a key witness in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

The fact that the witness was giving information contrary to his police statements in 1985 point to him being tutored, Kumar’s counsel said.

The submission came after a witness and the complainant in the case, Joginder Singh, told the court that certain facts written in the statement given by him to the police, relating to the case, were false.

Singh was being cross-examined before district judge Poonam A Bamba when he said that contrary to his previous statement to the police, he did not run away when some people came and looted his house during the riots.

Three persons — Kumar, Brahmanand Gupta and Ved Prakash — are facing trial on charges of murder and rioting pertaining to the killing of Surjit Singh (Joginder’s cousin) in Sultanpuri. Kumar is currently lodged in Tihar jail after conviction in another case related to the 1984 riots.

Singh had said that in 1985 some people had entered his house and looted jewellery and money. He said he had run away from his house and did not recognise any of them.

When the defense counsel pointed out that in his previous statement Singh had not named the accused or named any Surjit, the witness told the court, “I had named everyone. I had taken the name of Sajjan Kumar as one of the accused and given every detail about Surjit to the police. I don’t know if they had recorded it or not.”

The advocate appearing for the former Congress leader, however, said, “Singh has been tutored. It was evident from the previous statement and today’s statement that Singh was giving a false statement.”

Another witness, Cham Kaur, had on November 16 last year identified Kumar before the court as one who had allegedly instigated the mob to kill Sikhs. Kaur had told the court that she had seen Kumar allegedly addressing a crowd in the national Capital’s Sultanpuri area in 1984.

“On November 1, 1984, when I stepped out to look for my goat, I saw accused Sajjan Kumar addressing the crowd and saying ‘hamari ma maar di, Sardaro ko maar do’ (They killed our mother, kill the Sikhs),” Kaur had told the court. She further said that her son and father were killed the next morning.

Before Kaur, another key prosecution witness Sheela Kaur identified Kumar as one who had instigated a crowd in Sultanpuri.

The case was transferred from the Karkardooma court to the Patiala House court by the Delhi High Court, which had directed the district judge to video record the proceedings.

The Delhi High Court had, on December 17 last year, convicted Kumar and sentenced him to imprisonment for “remainder of his natural life” in another 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.