...
...
Next Story

SC gives Centre three months to decide on plea for ‘judicial vista’

The ‘judicial vista’ was proposed to come up on the government land and bungalows situated around the Supreme Court, including areas of Bhagwan Das Road, Tilak Marg, Tilak Lane, Purana Qila Road and Mathura Road.

Updated on: Apr 27, 2022 05:40 AM IST
By , NEW DELHI
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

India’s apex court on Tuesday gave the Centre three months to examine suggestions for creating a judicial vista after consulting the Supreme Court registry on the problems presently ailing lawyers and judges.

India’s apex court on Tuesday gave the Centre three months to examine suggestions for creating a judicial vista after consulting the Supreme Court registry on the problems presently ailing lawyers and judges. (PTI file)
India’s apex court on Tuesday gave the Centre three months to examine suggestions for creating a judicial vista after consulting the Supreme Court registry on the problems presently ailing lawyers and judges. (PTI file)

The court was hearing a petition filed by advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad seeking a judicial vista to provide for sufficient office space for judges, lawyers, Supreme Court registry and facilities for litigants. Stating that this idea must be given a thought by the Centre, a bench of justices Vineet Saran and JK Maheshwari posted the matter for next hearing on July 20.

Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Centre, informed the bench that he was aware of the problems of space in the top court and will take up the issue with the government. The court had on Monday asked the Centre to indicate its stand on this issue as it observed that just like Central Vista, having a judicial vista was logical.

“The SG has appeared and made a statement that the problems as pointed out in the petition will be looked into by the Centre in consultation with the Registry of the Supreme Court,” the bench said.

Senior advocate V Giri, appearing for the Supreme Court, said he will file an affidavit in response to the petition. The bench asked Giri to coordinate with Mehta and apprise him of the various problems that need to be resolved.

The petition pointed out that the infrastructure available at the Supreme Court was “disproportionate to the growth of the court” in terms of the number of judges, the registry, the bar, and the volume of cases.

“The present Supreme Court building was built in 1958 and now we are in 2022. If the Central Vista can be constructed in five years, even this project can be executed,” Prasad said.

The bench then said, “The government should take a call. We are glad this petition has been filed, although we do not know if it can happen in five years. The government can plan for it. But this has to be given a thought for the future.”

Mehta assured the court that he will take it up personally with concerned authorities, to which the bench said that in such matters, a solution can be worked out only by consensus.

The petitioner wanted the new vista to provide for a multilevel complex of about 50 courtrooms, with video conferencing facility and adequate seating capacity, multilevel chamber complex for lawyers, underground multilevel parking, office space for registry staff and law officers of central government, library, waiting longue and conference rooms, among other facilities.

The judicial vista was proposed to come up on the government land and bungalows situated around the Supreme Court, including areas of Bhagwan Das Road, Tilak Marg, Tilak Lane, Purana Qila Road and Mathura Road.

 
Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk Hunger Strike LIVE and more across India.
Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk Hunger Strike LIVE and more across India.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe