...
...
Next Story

SC ruling on Shariat court draws sharp reaction from clerics

The Supreme Court's verdict on Monday declaring that a Shariat court has no legal sanction drew sharp reaction from Muslim clerics who said that the Constitution allows them the right to work and act according to Muslim personal law.

Updated on: Jul 08, 2014 02:07 AM IST
Advertisement

The Supreme Court's verdict on Monday declaring that a Shariat court has no legal sanction drew sharp reaction from Muslim clerics who said that the Constitution allows them the right to work and act according to Muslim personal law.

HT Image
HT Image

Zafaryab Jilani, member of the Muslim Personal Law Board, said, "We are not doing anything parallel to the judicial system and we don't say that any order passed by a Qazi is binding on all. Our sole motto is to resolve a matter with the consent of two parties involved in accordance with Shariat."

Khalid Rasheed Farangi, a Muslim cleric, said that under the Constitution, Muslims have the right to work and act according to Muslim personal law.

"Indian Constitution has given us the right to act and work according to our Muslim personal law.

Read: Shariat courts have no legal sanctity, fatwas illegal, says SC

"One must also keep in mind that Shariat Application Act, 1937, has very clearly said that in those cases in which both parties are Muslims and the matter is related to nikaah, talaaq, zihar, lian, khula and mubaraat, the decisions will be taken in the light of the Muslim personal law," he said, adding that the verdict needs to be studied properly before a final statement can be given.

"If a person is practising a religion, he/she has to follow its preachings. A Muslim who does not follow the Sharia is not a true Muslim," he said.

Read:SC has not banned Shariat courts: Darul Uloom Deoband lawyer

Maulana Anisur Rehman, member of Imarat Shariah, Patna, however, agreed with the apex court ruling, saying that the judgement is not wrong and it is not going to hinder the functioning of Shariat courts.

"For arbitration, when two parties or people consensually approach the Shariat court, it is lawful. The Supreme Court is not wrong, but I need to go through the entire verdict properly," he said.

Disapproving of a Shariat court issuing fatwa and order against a person who is not before it, the Supreme Court today said it has no sanction of law and no legal status.Sharia courts not sanctioned by law, fatwas illegal says declares Supreme Court

 
Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk Hunger Strike LIVE and more across India.
Follow India news real-time updates and the latest news covered on Hindustan Times, featuring today's critical updates on Sonam Wangchuk Hunger Strike LIVE and more across India.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe