...
...
Next Story

Split SC verdict makes future of Vyapam students uncertain

Justice J Chelameswar and Justice AM Sapre of the Supreme Court, which is hearing the corruption case, agreed with the board’s decision to cancel the 634 admissions. But they ruled differently on the students’ future.

Updated on: May 16, 2016 12:32 AM IST
Advertisement

The jury is out on how to punish students from Madhya Pradesh who were admitted to medical colleges between 2007 and 2012 by the state’s corruption-riddled admission and recruitment authority.

Justice J Chelameswar and Justice AM Sapre of the Supreme Court, which is hearing the corruption case, agreed with the board’s decision to cancel the 634 admissions. But they ruled differently on the students’ future. (HT File Photo)
Justice J Chelameswar and Justice AM Sapre of the Supreme Court, which is hearing the corruption case, agreed with the board’s decision to cancel the 634 admissions. But they ruled differently on the students’ future. (HT File Photo)

The students had cleared the entrance exam for medical colleges conducted by the Madhya Pradesh Professional Examination Board (MPPEB), better known as Vyapam. The board is being investigated for its multi-layered, multi-crore college admission and recruitment scam that involves politicians, officials and businessmen.

Justice J Chelameswar and Justice AM Sapre of the Supreme Court, which is hearing the corruption case, agreed with the board’s decision to cancel the 634 admissions. But they ruled differently on the students’ future.

Justice Chelameswar allowed them to complete their study, provided they serve the nation for five years without salary. But colleague Justice Sapre said the students should be barred in view of the nature of the controversy.

The split verdict means it will be referred to the chief justice to constitute a bench of three judges for hearing the case.

In the 63-page verdict, Justice Chelameswar said it will not be prudent to let the students waste the knowledge they have acquired so far. He held they were not criminals but juveniles when the incident happened.

But Justice Sapre disagreed. “Once the cancellation of the examination results is upheld as being just, legal and proper, then its natural consequence must ensue.”

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bhadra Sinha

Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.

Check India news real-time updates, latest news on Hindustan Times and more across India.
Check India news real-time updates, latest news on Hindustan Times and more across India.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe