...
...
Next Story

15 years on... no end to legal battle

The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court and the Rae Bareli district court are still hearing two cases against the demolition of the mosque in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992, reports M Hasan.

Updated on: Dec 6, 2007, 14:02:05 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Lucknow
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

Fifteen years have not ended the litigation battle over the disputed Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site.

HT Image
HT Image

The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court and the Rae Bareli district court are still hearing two cases against the demolition of the mosque in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992. There are also four civil title suits pending with the Lucknow bench. The first civil suit was filed on January 16, 1950, the last on July 1, 1989. There are two other cases in which the Sunni Waqf Board has claimed right to the disputed land on which the mosque, built by emperor Babar in the 16th century, stood. All 4 cases were filed in the Faizabad district court but transferred to Lucknow later. So far, oral evidence has been admitted in the Waqf board cases. There are other unresolved angles in the Babri puzzle, like a report by the Archaeological Survey of India, which was asked to find out more about the disputed land and structure. The ASI submitted a report, which was challenged by Muslim organisations for mentioning that its team had found “distinctive features associated with... temples of north India”.

Of the two criminal cases filed by the CBI, case 197 is against kar sevaks, believed to be directly involved in bringing the structure down. But the Lucknow bench stayed the proceeding in this case after the submission of two revision petitions by the Faizabad district magistrate and the CBI. The second case, No. 198, deals with the demolition conspiracy. The case names BJP leaders L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, VHP leader Ashok Singhal, Uma Bharti and others. This case is in the Rae Bareli court, which on December 4, 2006, allowed the CBI to go ahead with its investigation.

The CBI did not present evidence in this case as it was waiting for an apex court order. Hearing in the Rae Bareli court has now commenced. The first evidence, that of Hanuman Prasad, was recorded in chief judicial magistrate in the Rae Bareli court on Wednesday. CBI advocate K.P. Singh produced witness Prasad who was posted as a clerk at the Ramjanmabhoomi police station on December 6, 1992, and had written the FIR. Prasad verified the signature of Ganga Prasad, who was the then incharge of the police post. The next hearing has been scheduled for December 13.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe