...
...
Next Story

SC upholds acquittal of ex-MP in rape case

Former member of the parliament (MP) from Karnataka Ravikant Patil walked free after the Supreme Court upheld his acquittal in a case of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape of a college student in 1999.

Updated on: May 17, 2011 01:02 AM IST
Hindustan Times | By , Mumbai
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

Former member of the parliament (MP) from Karnataka Ravikant Patil walked free after the Supreme Court upheld his acquittal in a case of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape of a college student in 1999.

HT Image
HT Image

The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by the Maharashtra government challenging Patil’s acquittal by the Bombay high court on September 9, 2004. Referring to the case put forth by the prosecution, a division bench of justice VS Sirpurkar and justice TS Thakur observed, “The (Bombay) high court has not erred in coming to the conclusion that the whole prosecution story was a myth,” before adding that the high court order was “perfectly justifiable”.

According to the prosecution, in 1999, Patil had proposed marriage to Nafisa (name changed), who was then a third year computer-engineering student at Walchand Institute of Technology, Solapur. However, her parents declined his proposal.

Public prosecutor UB Dube said that following the rejection, Patil threatened and brought Nafisa’s family to Mumbai on May 5, 1999. He converted to Islam and the nikah (marriage) was performed in the presence of a kazi (priest) the next day.

Sushil Karanjkar, advocate for Patil, argued that Nafisa’s family had made their own travel arrangements and had come to Mumbai by train – without any assistance – indicating that they were attending the marriage on their own accord. He also asked why the family had not registered a complaint after claiming they were “forced” to come to Mumbai for the nikah.

Further, Karanjkar pointed out that Patil had filed an affidavit wherein he stated that he had willingly converted to Islam. Even the Kazi had given a statement to that effect.

Asserting that there was a valid nikah nama (marriage document), Karanjkar said that Patil had also given Rs2.5 lakh as Mehar (wedding gift) to Nafisa.

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe