...
...
Next Story

DSK case: COO Dhananjay Pachpor bail plea to be heard on September 6

Pointing out his specific role in the scam, SPP Chavan said that bail should not be given to Pachpor as his deep involvement in land scam warranted further investigation by the police.

Updated on: Sep 1, 2018, 16:25:31 IST
Hindustan Times, Pune | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The prosecution continued its argument in connection with the bail application filed by DSK Chief Operating Officer (COO) Dhananjay Pachpor arrested in the Rs 2043 Crore Investor Deposit Scam. The arguments were held in the court of Special Judge D G Murumkar on Thursday. The court has kept Sept 6 as the next date of hearing in the case. Special Public Prosecutor Pravin Chavan said that role of Dhananjay Pachpor in Phursungi land deal was of crucial importance and he had been a beneficiary of Rs 49 lakh which he had taken from one of the DSKDL company accounts.

DS Kulkarni at the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in Pune. (HT File Photo)
DS Kulkarni at the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in Pune. (HT File Photo)

Pointing out his specific role in the scam, SPP Chavan said that bail should not be given to Pachpor as his deep involvement in land scam warranted further investigation by the police. The investigation revealed that the offence took place between 2006 to 2017 in the jurisdiction of Pune Court. The FIR, in short has alleged that DSK company cum Firms in order to dupe people had collected money from people under the garb of either deposits or loans, illegally by enticing with irrational and unreasonable returns, by way of advert ising, Fixed Deposit ( FD) function and

also through their agents.The said money was siphoned off and the company failed to repay it. Not only the accused failed to pay the interest but also the cheques issued by them were dishonoured. The directors of DSKDL Company were agents and merchants as per provisions of law. Investigation till date has revealed that during the said period, offences have been committed u/s 120 B, 409, 406, 411, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 109 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of MPID ACT by various accused at different point of time and places.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe