Russia reports radioactivity 1000 times above normal after claims of nuclear accident
Russia’s meteorological service said on Tuesday it had measured pollution of a radioactive isotope at nearly 1,000 times normal levels in the Ural mountains, the first official Russian data supporting reports that a nuclear incident had taken place.
The data appears to back up a report by the French nuclear safety institute IRSN, which said on November 9 a cloud of radioactive pollution over Europe had indicated some kind of leak had taken place at a nuclear facility either in Russia or Kazakhstan in the last week of September.
Neither Russia nor Kazakhstan has acknowledged any accident.
Russian state weather service Roshydromet said in a statement it had found “extremely high pollution” of ruthenium 106 in samples from two meteorological stations in the southern Urals region in late September and early October.
At the Agrayash weather station the levels were 986 times those of the previous month, while at the Novogorny station they were 440 times higher. The weather service did not rule out that the radioactive isotope could be absorbed into the atmosphere and reach Europe.
Western scientists said the ruthenium 106 levels disclosed did not by themselves indicate any major health threat, although it was still unclear what had happened.
“Ruthenium is very rare and hence its presence may suggest that an event of some nature has occurred. That being said, the natural abundance is so low that even a factor of 900 up on natural levels is still very low,” said Malcolm Sperrin, director of the Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering at Oxford University Hospitals in England.
Professor Paddy Regan at the University of Surrey said the fact that the ruthenium was found in isolation, rather than with other radioactive materials “suggests a leak from a fuel/reprocessing plant or somewhere they are separating the ruthenium” rather than a bigger nuclear accident.
“If it was a reactor leak or nuclear explosion, other radioisotopes would also be present in the ‘plume’ and from the reports, they are not,” Regan said.
Russia’s Consumer Rights Protection service said in a statement that the ruthenium 106 posed no threat to public health. Andrey Vazhenin, the main oncology specialist of the Chelyabinsk region where the two weather stations are located, was quoted by Interfax news agency as saying people had nothing no worry about. Those concerned should instead “watch football and drink beer”.
Still, some researchers called for a more complete investigation. Bruno Chareyron, head of independent French nuclear laboratory CRIIRAD, called on the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency to order an inspection and impose protective measures.
“It is deplorable that 31 years after Chernobyl we again remain completely in the dark about what has happened,” Chareyron said.
Plant denies it is source
The Agrayash weather station is located about 30 km from Mayak, a huge plant that reprocesses nuclear fuel and produces radioactive material for industrial and research purposes, owned by Russian state nuclear company Rosatom. Mayak accounts for half of Russian exports of radioactive isotopes.
In a statement, Mayak denied that its plant was the source of increased level of ruthenium 106. Rosatom said there were no accidents at any of its facilities which could increase the level of ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere.
Reacting to the reports of leaks, Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation said there were “no deficiencies in equipment operation or any violation of operational safety” at its facilities.
“The radiation situation around all nuclear facilities of the Russian Federation is normal and corresponds to the natural radiation background,” it said in a brief statement.
A separate statement from the Mayak Production Association said Roshydromet’s data on isotope contamination with ruthenium-106 had led to the conclusion that “the dose that could have been received by a person is 20,000 times less than the maximum permissible annual dose and does not pose any danger to human health and life”.
It noted that “extremely high concentrations” of ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere were recorded in September in Slovakia and Romania, which are located about 3,000 km from the Mayak plant.
The atmospheric pollution indicated in Roshydromet’s report is “not related to the activities” of the Mayak plant, it said. There was no production of ruthenium 106 sources at Mayak in 2017 and there had also been no separation of ruthenium 106 from spent nuclear fuel by the company for “many years now”, it added.
Greenpeace demands investigation
Greenpeace said in a statement on Tuesday that it would ask Russia’s prosecutors’ office to investigate whether there had been an accident in the area.
“It also demands a check into whether the atmospheric radionuclide monitoring system is sufficiently prepared for possible accidents, and whether public health around a possible release of Ruthenium 106 was sufficiently protected,” the environmental pressure group said in a statement.
The Institute of Nuclear Physics in Kazakhstan, which neighbours the southern Urals, has said there were no accidents at its scientific research reactor and no ruthenium 106 at its two disused testing areas in western Kazakhstan.