Today in New Delhi, India
Jun 17, 2019-Monday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

US gives NATO allies two months to come up with defence spending plans

Tillerson, in his first talks with NATO counterparts in Brussels, said that Washington was spending a disproportionate share on defence compared with its 27 partners.

world Updated: Mar 31, 2017 18:50 IST
AP, Brussels
NATO,NATO allies,US secretary of state
US secretary of state Rex Tillerson addresses the press ahead of a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels on Friday.(AP Photo)

US secretary of state Rex Tillerson on Friday warned NATO allies to boost defence spending or come up with plans to reach the alliance’s budget guidelines within two months.

Tillerson, in his first talks with NATO counterparts in Brussels, said that Washington was spending a “disproportionate share” on defence compared with its 27 partners, and that he expected action by the time President Donald Trump met with other alliance leaders on May 25.

NATO leaders pledged in 2014 to halt defence spending cuts and move towards a guideline target of 2% of gross domestic product within a decade. Only four other nations currently meet the target: Britain, Estonia, Greece and Poland.

“Our goal should be to agree at the May leaders meeting that by the end of the year all allies will have either met the pledge guidelines or will have developed plans that clearly articulate how, with annual milestone progress commitments, the pledge will be fulfilled,” Tillerson told the ministers.

Tillerson did not say what would happen if European allies and Canada fail to respect their pledges. During election campaigning, Trump suggested that he might not come to the defence of those allies who do not do their fair share, rocking allies near an increasingly aggressive Russia, such as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

However, Tillerson sought to calm any fears, saying on Friday that “we understand that a threat against one of us is a threat against all of us, and we will respond accordingly. We will uphold the agreements we have made to defend our allies.”

NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg (C), US secretary of state Rex Tillerson (fourth from right) with ministers of foreign affairs at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday. ( AFP Photo )

The United States is by far NATO’s most powerful ally. It spends more on defence than all the others combined; 3.61% of GDP in 2016, according to NATO estimates, although US spending, too, has tapered off in recent years.

Germany spent 1.19% of its overall budget on defence last year.

But German foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel said it would be “unrealistic” for his country to hike spending from 35 billion euros ($37 billion) a year to over 70 billion euros, which would see Berlin allocate more to defence than Russia currently.

“I don’t know a politician in Germany who believes that this would be achievable or even desirable,” Gabriel said.

He said security was also about crisis prevention, not just combat, and noted that Germany spends a lot of money on refugees who arrive because military interventions have failed.

Seven countries — including Canada, Italy and Spain — would have to virtually double their spending to reach the target.

Canadian foreign minister Chrystia Freeland said beyond money, “it is also really important to look at capabilities and what countries are actually doing.”

“We really feel that we are doing our share,” she said, highlighting Canada’s troop deployment to Latvia to help deter Russian aggression.

Tillerson also urged NATO to do more to fight the Islamic State group and other extremists, notably by countering Islamic State (IS) online messaging and propaganda.

NATO has fought insurgents in Afghanistan, and is training Iraqi officers so that local forces can make a strong stand against extremists. There is no appetite to deploy troops in counter-terrorism operations. Allies believe that the international coalition against IS should be leading combat operations, not NATO.

NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said the lesson learned from operations in Afghanistan, but also in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina, is that “in the long run it is much better to fight terrorism and project stability by training local forces, building local security institutions, instead of NATO deploying a large number of combat troops.”

First Published: Mar 31, 2017 18:50 IST