...
...
...
Next Story

Why JPMorgan Chase removed Trump's bank account. Debanking lawsuit explained

Donald Trump sues JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon for $5 billion, alleging politically motivated closure of accounts.

Published on: Jan 23, 2026 01:25 am IST
By Shirin Gupta
Advertisement

President Donald Trump filed a $5 billion lawsuit against the banking giant JPMorgan Chase and its CEO Jamie Dimon on January 22. Trump alleged that JPMorgan Chase debanked him and his companies for political reasons.

Donald Trump sues JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon for $5 billion, alleging politically motivated closure of accounts.(AFP)

The lawsuit was filed in Florida state court and accuses that JPMorgan closed multiple accounts related to Trump without any explanation in the wake of the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack.

Read more: Why Trump is suing JPMorgan Chase, CEO Jamie Dimon - Explained

What does Trump's lawsuit say about debanking?

The suit claims that JPMorgan and Dimon violated Florida’s deceptive trade practices law, engaged in trade libel, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by shutting off Trump's access to core banking services.

The suit detailed that the bank's “reckless decision is leading a growing trend by financial institutions in the United States of America to cut off a consumer’s access to banking services if their political views contradict with those of the financial institution.”

Read more: Trump administration to block foreign aid from those promoting abortion, DEI and gender identity

What did JPMorgan and Dimon say?

Dimon told CNBC that the bank “regrets” that Trump had to assert a lawsuit against them; however, he believes that the “suit has no merit.”

Patricia Wexler, JPMorgan's spokeswoman, told CNBC, “We respect the President’s right to sue us and our right to defend ourselves - that’s what courts are for. ”

She added, “JPMC does not close accounts for political or religious reasons.”

However, she admitted that the bank closes accounts if “they create legal or regulatory risk for the company.”

She said, “We regret having to do so, but often rules and regulatory expectations lead us to do so.”

She added, “We have been asking both this Administration and prior administrations to change the rules and regulations that put us in this position, and we support the Administration’s efforts to prevent the weaponization of the banking.”

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Shirin Gupta

Shirin Gupta is a content producer with the Hindustan Times. She covers everything between politics, entertainment and sports at the US desk. Shirin got interested in political journalism during her time as a web editor at her college newspaper NCC News in Syracuse when she first started seeing the effects of national politics in life of her fellow colleagues. Shirin has worked on a wide range of fast-moving and developing stories locally when she was at NCC editing accessible reports for the audience. Her current role requires her to track real-time updates, verify information and present balanced coverage across diverse beats. Covering US politics from an international newsroom perspective has further deepened her understanding of how domestic decisions can have far-reaching global consequences. With a keen interest in international affairs, Shirin continues to build her expertise in geopolitics, policy shifts, and cross-border developments. She aims to learn and evolve her reporting in matters of geopolitics and international issues. Outside the newsroom Shirin writes about books and music for her personal blog. She is an avid consumer of pop culture and reveres literature.

Stay updated with US News covering politics, crime, weather, local events, and sports highlights. Get the latest on Donald Trump and American politics along with Horoscope 2026.
Stay updated with US News covering politics, crime, weather, local events, and sports highlights. Get the latest on Donald Trump and American politics along with Horoscope 2026.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Subscribe Now