...
...
Next Story

‘Green cracker’ farce: Lko sees toxic climb before breather

The city witnessed a steady deterioration in air quality over a three-day period. Its average AQI, based on readings from 6 monitoring stations, rose from 207 on Nov 7 to 233 on Diwali (Nov 8) and further to 245 on Monday; on Tuesday (Novr 10), AQI turned moderate at 172

Published on: Nov 10, 2026, 23:55:20 IST
Advertisement

LUCKNOW A thick blanket of acrid smoke invaded living rooms and reduced midnight road visibility to a bare 200 metres on Sunday as unbridled firecracker bursting plunged Lucknow and much of Uttar Pradesh into a post-Diwali respiratory crisis.

Since 2015, Lucknow’s air has been worse the day after Diwali than the day before it every year, according to the CPCB 4pm bulletins. (Deepak Mishra/HT Photo)
Since 2015, Lucknow’s air has been worse the day after Diwali than the day before it every year, according to the CPCB 4pm bulletins. (Deepak Mishra/HT Photo)

While winds offered the state capital a breather by Tuesday — bringing the Air Quality Index (AQI) down to a ‘moderate’ 172 — the preceding 48 hours left asthma patients gasping.

“Lucknow witnessed a steady deterioration in air quality over a three-day period. Its average AQI, based on readings from six monitoring stations, rose from 207 on November 7 to 233 on Diwali (November 8) and further to 245 on Monday. PM2.5 was the prominent pollutant,” an expert said analysing the CPCB data. On Tuesday (November 10), AQI in the state capital turned moderate at 172.

AQI slipped to 233 on Diwali (November 8) and 245 the following day (November 9) – both were “poor” compared to last year’s Diwali’ AQI of 144, which was “moderate” followed by AQI 250 the following day, as per data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). But last year Diwali fell on October 20, nearly three weeks earlier.

In contrast (AQI.in), an open-source air quality monitoring platform created to provide real-time air pollution data and actionable health insight put Lucknow’s AQI at 1697 as “hazardous” on Diwali night at 11:11pm and 1470 on the same date at midnight. Lucknowites claimed that the night sky turned smoky while visibility dropped significantly with haze all around.

“Visibility had dropped to 1000 metres on Diwali midnight and it kept deteriorating with passage of time, and at 7am it dropped to 300 metres,” said a met official.

“In the name of green crackers, everything went up in the air. There should be some checks on crackers manufacturing units to see that not very poisonous chemicals are used in making crackers. We also recommend some kind of uniformity in cracker manufacturing and the material used in them. It is wrong to blame only the poor/uneducated for adding to the pollution by lighting fire crackers. We found that educated/rich people are more to be blamed,” said Shailendra Kumar Yadav, assistant professor in the department of environmental sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow.

A resident in Lucknow claimed that many people experienced a thick layer of smoke entering their living rooms on Diwali night while people could barely see anything beyond 200 metres on Diwali night while driving.

Air quality deteriorated sharply across several cities in Uttar Pradesh. On Diwali, AQI in Ghaziabad was 344 (’very poor’), Noida 318 (very poor), Greater Noida 299 (poor) and Meerut 295 (poor). On the following day (Monday), the AQI in Ghaziabad was 324 (very poor), Noida 332 (very poor), Greater Noida 252 (poor), Meerut 269 (poor), according to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).

According to CPCB’s classification, an AQI between 201 and 300 is considered ‘poor’ and can cause breathing discomfort to most people on prolonged exposure. The ‘very poor’ category, ranging from 301 to 400, can cause respiratory illness on prolonged exposure, even among healthy people.

Khora in Ghaziabad district recorded the worst air quality in the state, with an AQI of 380, up from 364 on Diwali. Anpara in Sonbhadra district followed with 355, compared to 349 a day earlier. Noida recorded an AQI of 332, while Khurja’s reading jumped from 240 to 331.

Ghaziabad (324), Baghpat (305), Gajraula (304) and Bulandshahr (303) were among the other cities in the ‘very poor’ category.

Several cities witnessed a sharp deterioration in air quality within 24 hours of Diwali celebrations. Rae Bareli recorded one of the steepest rises, with its AQI jumping from 91 (‘satisfactory’) on Sunday to 218 (‘poor’) on Monday.

Prayagraj’s AQI increased from 149 to 241, while Gorakhpur recorded a rise from 182 to 261. In Varanasi, the index climbed from 224 to 274. Moradabad also slipped from the ‘moderate’ category, with an AQI of 151, to the ‘poor’ category at 222.

Fatehpur Sikri recorded an AQI of 203, compared to 110 on Diwali. Jhansi and Bareilly, however, remained in the ‘moderate’ category, with readings of 144 and 102, respectively.

Other cities in the ‘poor’ category included Shamli (275), Meerut (269), Modinagar (260), Greater Noida (252), Muzaffarnagar (225), Kanpur (221) and Hapur (202).

Meanwhile, Agra (187), Firozabad (176), Mathura (169), Pratapgarh (141) and Vrindavan (110) remained in the ‘moderate’ category.

The post-Diwali deterioration was attributed to emissions from firecrackers and unfavourable weather conditions that can prevent pollutants from dispersing. PM2.5, fine particulate matter that can penetrate deep into the lungs, remained the prominent pollutant across several cities.

While both the pollutants – PM 10 and PM 2.5 – can be harmful for health, CSIR-IITR director Bhaskar Narayan said PM 2.5 can be severe as it can get mixed with the bloodstream. “The pollutants formed due to the burning of firecrackers are the cause of increase of air pollution in Lucknow, which may also be the cause of increased mortality and morbidity in urban areas. Individual bursting of firecrackers should be discouraged and community burning be promoted,” he said.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rajeev Mullick

Rajeev Mullick, Assistant Editor, is a Lucknow-based journalist with over 26 years of experience covering governance, public policy and administration in Uttar Pradesh. His reporting focuses on the district administration, the Divisional Commissioner's Office, the Regional Meteorological Centre, and government policies relating to technical, higher, secondary and primary education. Known for impactful public-interest journalism, his investigations have led to significant policy attention, including a report on deficiencies in a state-run school footwear distribution scheme that prompted widespread national coverage and High Court intervention. He broke the story on the Uttar Pradesh government's One District One Cuisine initiative, highlighting the inclusion of sweets and the exclusion of non-vegetarian dishes, triggering widespread public debate. He covered Mahakumbh 2025 at Prayagraj, reports on the event's administrative, logistical and civic dimensions. From 2012 to 2024, he headed the Lucknow City Bureau, leading coverage of the state's administrative and civic developments while mentoring young reporters. He loves to travel, listen to music. He is fond of eating good food both veg and non veg. He has travelled to several states like West Bengal, Uttarakhand, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Family Nadu, Kerela, Bihar, Jharkhand and home state UP.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks