...
...
Next Story

Mumbai court relief for Pankaj, Sameer Bhujbal in 2015 case

A special sessions judge discharged Pankaj Bhujbal, son of cabinet minister Chhagan Bhujbal, nephew Sameer Bhujbal booked in a case of cheating, breach of trust and under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA) in 2015

Published on: Sep 08, 2021 10:21 PM IST
By , Mumbai
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

A special sessions judge on Wednesday discharged Pankaj Bhujbal, son of cabinet minister Chhagan Bhujbal, nephew Sameer Bhujbal and two other directors of Devisha Infrastructure Private Limited — Rajesh Dharap and Satyan Kesarkar — who were booked by the Navi Mumbai Police for cheating, breach of trust and under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA). The case was registered against the Bhujbals and others in 2015 on a complaint of a Chembur resident who claimed that the company had planned to sell 2,344 flats and had collected 44 crores but had not developed the project.

(Getty Images/iStockphoto)
(Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Additional session’s judge HS Satbhai allowed the discharge application of all four persons, under section 239 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for discharge.

The complaint was registered on June 13, 2015, by one Yunus Shaikh. Sameer and Kesarkar appeared when summons were issued against them and were granted bail immediately.

The state claimed that the four applicants who have applied for discharge are directors of Devisha Infrastructure Private Limited (DIPL). The applicants along with others hatched a conspiracy and projected that they will develop project Hexworld on 25-acres of land in Kharghar. However, they were fully aware that DIPL had no lands in its name, no construction permission and no possession of the land. They misrepresented to potential flat buyers by concealing the above facts with a view to cheat them and sold 2,344 flats and collected 44.04 crores from buyers. The possession of the flats was delayed, the construction has been completed only up to the plinth, and till 2011 DIPL had no permission to undertake any constructions. The sale proceeds were deposited in a designated account, however, the same was not used for construction and was siphoned off for personal use of the applicants. Neither the booking amount was refunded nor the flat was handed over to the flat purchasers. The charge sheet was filed in the matter on February 25, 2016.

The court after hearing both the parties on Wednesday discharged the four applicants and posted the matter on September 20 for further hearing.

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe