‘Congress gave primacy to Sharia’: BJP invokes Shah Bano case in reaction to Supreme Court's ‘maintenance’ verdict
Sudhanshu Trivedi, the BJP spokesperson and MP, said the Supreme Court ended one of the biggest threats to the Constitution.
Reacting to the Supreme Court's judgment that Muslim women are entitled to seek maintenance from their husbands after divorce, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Wednesday invoked the controversial Shah Bano case in their attack on the Congress, saying the Rajiv Gandhi government gave primacy to Sharia over the Constitution.

In 1985, the Supreme Court allowed Shah Bano's plea for alimony from her husband after she was divorced. However, the then-Congress government passed a law in the Parliament to overrule the verdict.
Sudhanshu Trivedi, a BJP spokesperson and Rajya Sabha MP, today said the Supreme Court ended one of the biggest threats to the Constitution.
“Whenever the Congress has been in power, the Constitution was under threat. It (the Rajiv Gandhi government's) was a decision which gave primacy to Sharia over the Constitution. The prestige of the Constitution which was crushed during the Congress government has been restored by this order. The verdict has ended one of the big threats posed to the Constitution,” he said.
Also read: Divorced Muslim women can seek maintenance from husband, rules Supreme Court
He said the Supreme Court's verdict shouldn't be seen from the point of view of religion. He said it was an issue of equal rights.
He claimed that there was no secular state where Sharia provisions like halala, triple talaq and Haj subsidy were allowed.
Also read: From Shah Bano to Shayara Bano: The evolution of Indian society and polity
Trivedi said the Congress government had turned India into a partial Islamic state.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a Muslim woman can seek maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the CrPC and said the "religion-neutral" provision applies to all married women irrespective of their religion.
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 will not prevail over the secular law, a bench of justices B V Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih said, stressing that maintenance is not charity but the right of all married women.
With inputs from PTI
ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

E-Paper


