Sign in

SC to hear wrestlers plea for sexual harassment case against WFI chief on Friday

The petitioners told the court they do not expect justice from the government or the police as WFI president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh is a ruling BJP MP

Updated on: Apr 25, 2023, 13:57:27 IST
By ,
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Supreme Court on Tuesday called the allegations of sexual harassment against Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament (MP) Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh “serious” while issuing a notice to the Delhi Police in the matter.

The wrestlers addressing a press conference during their protest against the Wrestling Federation of India in New Delhi. (Hindustan Times)
The wrestlers addressing a press conference during their protest against the Wrestling Federation of India in New Delhi. (Hindustan Times)

Wrestlers, including Olympic medallists, petitioned the court on Monday for registration of a case against Singh over the allegations, turning down the sports ministry’s call for negotiations.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the petition before a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha for an urgent hearing. He said the wrestlers have been sitting on a protest. “...the police are not acting. Look at the allegations. ...Even police personnel can be prosecuted for not registering an FIR [first information report].”

Sibal argued since the matter involved sexual harassment, the police were bound to register a case.

The CJI said: “There are serious allegations contained in the petition at [the] behest of wrestlers who have represented India with regard to sexual harassment. Issue notice, returnable on Friday.”

He added the court is conscious of its duty to protect fundamental rights under Constitution’s Article 32, which allows individuals to move to the top court to seek justice.

The bench directed redaction of the identities of the petitioners from their petition. It added that the redacted copy of the plea should be made available in the public domain.

The wrestlers, including a minor who allegedly faced sexual harassment, were named in the plea.

They said their repeated attempts to convince Delhi Police to register an FIR on their April 21 complaint did not yield results.

On Monday, they mentioned their plea through senior advocate Narendra Hooda before the bench for an urgent hearing. As the petition was not cleared for mentioning, the CJI asked Hooda to mention it before him on Tuesday after complying with the standard procedure.

The petitioners told the court they do not expect justice from the government or the police as Singh is a ruling party MP. The petition has made the Delhi Police chief and SHO of Connaught Place police station respondents while seeking registration of an FIR on the complaints that stretch from 2012 till last year.

Addressing a press conference on the second day of their sit-in protest on Monday, the wrestlers urged all political parties and khap panchayats to support them. In January, they appealed for keeping the protests apolitical.

The petitioners alleged that they face threats from Singh and sought the court’s intervention to ensure the Parliamentarian is brought to book.

The Union sports ministry issued an order on Monday directing the Indian Olympic Association to form a transitory or ad hoc committee to run the WFI and also prepare for fresh elections. It annulled the federation’s earlier announcement that it would elect its new office-bearers on May 7.

Singh has completed three four-year terms. He is ineligible to seek re-election as WFI president.

Singh, a six-time MP, has dismissed the wrestlers’ ongoing protest as a “publicity stunt” at the behest of those whose careers have ended and cannot win medals anymore.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More