...
...
Next Story

SYL: SC turns down Punjab’s plea against judge

An interlocutory application (IA) filed by the Punjab government in the Supreme Court during the resumed hearing of the presidential reference on the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act-2004 was rejected by the five-member constitutional bench on Tuesday.

Updated on: Mar 09, 2016 09:23 AM IST
Hindustan Times | By , Chandigarh
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

An interlocutory application (IA) filed by the Punjab government in the Supreme Court during the resumed hearing of the presidential reference on the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act-2004 was rejected by the five-member constitutional bench on Tuesday.

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Punjab, requested Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel to recuse from the bench on the grounds that he belonged to Haryana. “The request was supplemented by several such precedents in which cases related to inter-state water disputes are generally not heard by a judge from either state. However, the application was rejected,” said advocate JS Chhabra who also appeared on Punjab’s behalf.

“We had attached with our application judgments where judges, including Justices JS Khehar, SS Nijjar, HL Dattu and Kurian Joseph had opted out of such cases voluntarily,” said Chhabra.

The bench headed by Justice Anil R Dave, however, rejected the application giving instances where such cases had been handled by judges from home states.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe