SIPRI researcher reveals who’s really paying for wars as US steps back on defense spending | Trump

What does it really mean when the world spends more on war for the 11th straight year? The latest report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute doesn’t just track numbers it reveals a pattern. A pattern where global instability is no longer reactive but sustained. From the United States still leading but slowly losing its gap to Europe stepping up under pressure and unexpected players like Algeria quietly ramping up the data raises more questions than it answers. Is military spending still about immediate threats or are we looking at a long-term shift in how nations prepare for conflict? Why are some regions accelerating while others show restraint even after direct confrontation? And if 2025 looked like this on paper what does 2026 already described as unprecedented actually signal? In this conversation SIPRI researcher Xiao Liang breaks down the numbers behind the headlines the contradictions within them and the patterns that may define the next phase of global security. Because sometimes the most important battles aren’t fought on the ground they’re built into budgets.