E-Paper
Admn to calculate exact pricing for Chandigarh Housing Board’s scheme for UT employees
This was decided in a virtual meeting held here on Wednesday on the directions of the Punjab and Haryana high court, and chaired by the Union home secretary.
The UT administration will be recalculating the exact pricing of the two different options for making the UT Employees’ Housing Scheme affordable. The detailed pricing will be shared with the employee representatives for their consent.
This was decided in a virtual meeting held here on Wednesday on the directions of the Punjab and Haryana high court, and chaired by the Union home secretary.
Senior UT officials including UT adviser Manoj Parida, Chandigarh Housing Board chairman Ajoy Kumar Sinha, CHB chief executive officer Yashpal Garg along with the employees’ representatives Dr Dharmender Shastri, Balwinder Singh, and Dr Brahmprakash Yadav were present in the meeting.
Dr Shashtri said, “The administration has shared three options. First, charging only for the plotted land, and not for the total land. Second, construction of an 11-storey tower project in Sector 56. Third, the Solanki proposal—to allot at an old rate with 10% interest. But, we said, employees need to know the exact pricing in each of the options before they can take any decision.”
“After deliberations to resolve the issue regarding rates of flats, it was decided that the calculation of rates be made again for different categories by applying various factors like floor area ratio, collector rate, plotted area etc. in consultation with the representatives of petitioners of the scheme’s court case,” stated an administration press statement.
Thereafter, another meeting will be held with the Union home secretary for further directions in the matter. Parida stated that the project will not be abandoned and employees will certainly get houses at concessional rates.
The housing scheme, floated in 2008, failed to take off even though the employees had already deposited around ₹57 crore with the CHB in 2012. The latest administration action to resolve the issue pending for more than a decade came only after the HC intervened. The court had stated that it will hold individual administration’s officers accountable for the non-resolution of the issue.
