Not jailing him, only attaching salary: Himachal HC after education secy fails to comply with orders

By, Shimla
Updated on: Aug 05, 2023 12:38 am IST

Taking serious note of non-compliance with its orders, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh has directed the chief secretary of Himachal Pradesh to attach the salary of the secretary (education) within two days. The petitioners approached the HC with the plea that they are superannuated employees of the privately run educational institutions, taken over by the Himachal Pradesh government and are entitled for financial benefits like gratuity and leave encashment.

Taking serious note of non-compliance with its orders, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh has directed the chief secretary of Himachal Pradesh to attach the salary of the secretary (education) within two days.

Taking serious note of non-compliance with its orders, the Himachal Pradesh HC has directed the chief secretary of Himachal Pradesh to attach the salary of the secretary (education) within two days. (Representational image)
Taking serious note of non-compliance with its orders, the Himachal Pradesh HC has directed the chief secretary of Himachal Pradesh to attach the salary of the secretary (education) within two days. (Representational image)

A Division Bench, comprising Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Bipin C Negi, passed this order on two different petitions filed by Neel Kamal Singh and Surinder Nath.

Abhishek Jain is the current education secretary to the state of Himachal Pradesh.

The petitioners approached the High Court with the plea that they are superannuated employees of the privately run educational institutions, taken over by the Himachal Pradesh government and are entitled for financial benefits like gratuity and leave encashment. The court ruled in favour of the petitioners and directed the state government to release consequential benefits to the petitioners. When the financial benefits were not released in favour of the petitioners despite the court verdict, they again approached the High Court for the execution of court orders.

The execution petitions so filed were finally decided by the high court and the concerned department was directed to comply with the court order but the respondents did not pay heed to court orders despite sufficient opportunity afforded by the court.

Today, senior additional advocate general submits that the matter is pending consideration, before the concerned secretary and therefore he seeks further time for compliance, said the court.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances, recorded herein-in-above, the court observed, it is apparent that the secretary (education) has failed to ensure the implementation of the order passed by the court despite granting several dates.

“Therefore, we are constrained to take coercive measures for ensuring the implementation of the order,” said the court.

“On the persuasive request of the senior additional advocate general, we are taking a lenient view and instead of directing the civil imprisonment/detention of the concerned officer, we are only directing attachment of salary,” the court said.

Accordingly, it is directed that the salary of respondent No.1 the secretary (education) be attached till further order. The chief secretary was directed to ensure the attachment of salary within two days. Similar observations were made in the other execution petition of Neel Kamal Singh. The matters have been posted for the next hearing on August 9.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
SHARE
close
Story Saved
Live Score
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
Get App
crown-icon
Subscribe Now!
AI Summary AI Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has ordered the chief secretary of the state to attach the salary of the education secretary within two days due to non-compliance with court orders. The order came after two petitioners approached the court seeking financial benefits from the government after their privately run educational institutions were taken over by the state. Despite a court ruling in their favor, the benefits were not released, prompting the court to take coercive measures. The case will be heard again on August 9.