...
...
Next Story

PM Modi could have taken more unilateral steps to integrate S Asia

The contradictory pulls of South Asian countries that have stymied regional cooperation in the past are again on view at the Saarc summit in Kathmandu.

Updated on: Nov 27, 2014 03:28 PM IST
Advertisement

The contradictory pulls of South Asian countries that have stymied regional cooperation in the past are again on view at the Saarc summit in Kathmandu. At the time of going to press there was no headway on the three agreements to improve connectivity owing to Pakistan’s objections that it did not have enough time to consider the proposals.

The-18th-Summit-Meeting-of-Saarc-consisting-of-eight-South-Asian-nations-is-being-held-in-Kathmandu-Nepal-AFP-Photo
The-18th-Summit-Meeting-of-Saarc-consisting-of-eight-South-Asian-nations-is-being-held-in-Kathmandu-Nepal-AFP-Photo

Earlier there were differences over China’s role in Saarc with Islamabad making a pitch for a bigger role for observers. Some Cabinet ministers in Nepal also backed Beijing’s efforts to have a more active role in the grouping. India rejected the suggestion on the grounds that Saarc needs to deepen cooperation within the organisation before it considers expansion. Given that the epicentre of the world economy is shifting from the West to the East, it is only natural that Asia should have interlocking institutional arrangements that include China — which incidentally backed India this year for full membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. India’s reluctance is, however, understandable. Beijing tends to buy influence in countries quickly and thus it is only reasonable that New Delhi is not keen on offering Saarc as a platform for China. That said, Beijing’s ambitions should prompt India to urgently work on the integration agenda with its smaller neighbours since China anyway will — with or without entry into Saarc.

All these steps are laudable, but regrettably they fall short of the unilateral initiatives that strategists hoped he would announce now, particularly relating to opening India’s market to neighbours and restructuring its transit regimes so that neighbours can trade with each other through India. Mr Modi seems to prefer an incremental, bilateral approach to connectivity rather than an expansive, radical one. That approach is not without its merits. It all depends on how quickly agreements can be reached and infrastructure projects completed.

 
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe