Faculty seeks ‘permanent’ solution to Stephen’s row

The debate and resentment over appointment to ad-hoc posts in St. Stephen’s College is just the tip of the iceberg, say teachers. Ritika Chopra finds out...

The debate and resentment over appointment to ad-hoc posts in St. Stephen’s College is just the tip of the iceberg, say teachers. What has the college faculty really worried is the judicial cloud surrounding the appointment of permanent teachers, which has consequently led to a spurt in lecturers working on a temporary basis. Last year the college had 16 ad-hoc teachers. This is just a little less than the maximum number allowed by the St. Stephen’s College constitution.

HT Image

The constitution states: Not more than one-third of the total number of teaching staff shall be on a temporary or contract basis at any time. Teachers fear that the college will, in all probability, cross the one-third mark — that is 20 teachers — during the new academic year and this will not do much good to the standards in teaching.This problem stems from a petition filed by St. Stephen’s College before the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI) in 2005. The petition challenged the applicability of University Ordinance in selection of teachers in the College.

Though the NCMEI passed a verdict in favour of St. Stephen’s in 2006, Delhi University challenged this order in the High Court and obtained a stay order on the same. The stalemate has not been broken yet. As long as the case is pending in the High Court the college can appoint permanent teachers as per DU rules. St. Stephen’s, however, has chosen to make do with ad-hoc and guest lecturers for the time being.

“We have lecturers working for the college on temporary basis, who are dedicated teachers working here without any of the perks,” said a teacher.