...
...
Next Story

SC comes down heavily on CBI

CBI director Ranjit Sinha's admission that his officers had regular interactions with officials of coal ministry and Prime Minister's Office, incurred the ire of the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Bhadra Sinha reports. Coalgate: who said what | Coal scam: A look back |

Updated on: May 09, 2013 01:52 AM IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

CBI director Ranjit Sinha's admission that his officers had regular interactions with officials of coal ministry and Prime Minister's Office, incurred the ire of the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

HT Image
HT Image

"Is the job of the CBI to interact or interrogate? Is this a collaborative action going on?" asked a bench headed by Justice RM Lodha.

The court found it strange that even after receiving documents CBI continued its interaction instead of putting interrogatories. "Clarification cannot be sought by word of mouth," the bench said.

"One year has passed since preliminary inquiry was registered. Nothing substantial has happened except for interaction," it added.

The two officers, Shatrughna Singh and AK Bhalla had sought deletion of CBI's tentative finding that there was no system in place to award weightage points to coal block applicants.

Their suggestion to add a line about non-existence of approved guidelines for allocation of coal blocks too was accepted by the CBI.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/5/09-05-pg9a.jpg


Explaining the interactions between CBI sleuths and bureaucrats, CBI counsel UU Lalit said the meeting was in connection with the 1.5 lakh pages of documents handed over to the agency.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/5/09-05-pg9b.jpg

The arguments, however, failed to impress the bench which asked the CBI director to clarify if the two bureaucrats took the status report with them or not.

"They (the joint secretaries) meet the CBI officers on March 6. A day later they come back to the CBI officers and suggest changes. I am sure they don't have such a good memory. The affidavit does not state if they took the draft report with them," said the bench, also comprising Justice Madan B Lokur and Justice Joseph Kurien.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bhadra Sinha

Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe