...
...
Next Story

View: India was ready for round II, Pakistan begged US for intervention on May 10

That Modi government did not escalate after Rawalpindi strike was simply because Pakistan is no match for India.

Updated on: May 18, 2025, 13:26:31 IST
Advertisement

Despite the Western media’s attempt to equate India and Pakistan in terms of military capability, Islamabad quite literally begged for US intervention after New Delhi struck the Nur Khan air base in the heart of Pakistan with missiles on the morning of May 10, alongside an imminent Indian Navy attack on the Karachi naval port.

This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows Nur Khan Air Base with damaged buildings after a strike during hostilities with India in Rawalpindi. (AP)
This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows Nur Khan Air Base with damaged buildings after a strike during hostilities with India in Rawalpindi. (AP)

That the Modi government chose not to escalate further after the Rawalpindi strike was simply because Pakistan is no match for India.

Pakistan’s capitulation was evident from the frenzied attempts by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to reach his counterparts, S Jaishankar and Ajit Doval, on the morning of May 10.

While the Nur Khan air base was hit hard by Indian missiles in the early hours, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO), Kashif Abdullah, called his Indian counterpart at 10:38 a.m. the same day, claiming to have intelligence about an imminent BrahMos missile strike on the Karachi naval port. Although the Pakistani DGMO attempted to threaten retaliation, the Indian side remained unfazed and fully battle-ready.

While several Western narratives, including those pushed by French official media, attempted to portray Chinese weaponry as superior to India’s, the reality is that the Modi government was prepared to climb the full escalatory ladder if Pakistan chose that path. India was under no pressure to de-escalate, especially since Pakistan had virtually no viable military targets remaining east of the Indus, following the decapitation of 11 air bases and the complete neutralization of its air defense systems. Team Modi had no intention of striking Balochistan or the Pashtun-dominated Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region. In fact, India had only just begun: its mission objective—to destroy terror infrastructure in Pakistan—was accomplished within 25 minutes on the morning of May 7.

Interestingly, even as French state media tried to undermine its own Rafale fighters used by the Indian Air Force, Indian aerial platforms, missiles, loitering munitions, and drones performed exceptionally well and decisively overwhelmed Pakistan’s armed forces. After the May 10 missile strike, India retained the capability to strike any target within Pakistan, as the latter’s Chinese-supplied air defence systems had either been destroyed or jammed.

India’s decision to call off hostilities stemmed from a strategic assessment: mission objectives had been achieved, and further engagement would only allow Islamabad to play the victim card to the West and China. Simply put, India and Pakistan are not equals, and New Delhi had no interest in further pursuing a military conflict after effectively neutralizing Pakistan’s response capability.

Given the advisory role played by Chinese and Turkish personnel in aiding Pakistan’s aerial warfare strategy, India is expected to take counter-action against all parties who sided with terrorist elements following the Pahalgam massacre. The Modi government is now placing greater emphasis on stand-off weapons, acknowledging that the era of conventional land battles is largely over. With 31 US-made Predator armed drones set to be inducted into the Indian armed forces in 2028, India is also rapidly advancing in the development of high-altitude armed drones and low-cost swarm drones—similar to the Turkish models deployed by Pakistan along the Indian border.

While Pakistan is expected to feel the impact of India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty next month, Operation Sindoor has reinforced a crucial lesson for New Delhi: India stands alone and must build its own comprehensive military capabilities to counter the real adversaries in its neighborhood—and in the West.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Shishir Gupta

Shishir Gupta is Executive Editor at Hindustan Times and one of India's top journalists covering national security, strategic affairs, foreign policy and geopolitics. Over the past three decades, he has extensively reported on India's military, diplomatic and security landscape, covering every major conflict and national security challenge, from the 1999 Kargil War and the 2020 East Ladakh standoff to Operation Sindoor in 2025. He has also covered major terror attacks, including the IC-814 hijacking, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and the 2025 Pahalgam terror strike, along with numerous Pakistan-backed terrorist incidents in the Kashmir Valley and across India. He has reported on national and state elections for more than three decades. A recognised authority on strategic affairs, Gupta has covered India's nuclear programme since the Pokhran-II (Shakti series) tests in May 1998 and has written extensively on global nuclear issues, Indian diplomacy and the country's expanding global outreach. He has also reported widely on international conflicts and terrorism, with a special focus on the Indian subcontinent. Gupta has interviewed Prime Minister Narendra Modi more than four times, including Modi's first interview with the print media after becoming Prime Minister in May 2014. His other interviews include three with the Dalai Lama, as well as conversations with Benjamin Netanyahu, Amit Shah, Yogi Adityanath, S. Jaishankar, Nirmala Sitharaman and Piyush Goyal. He is the author of Indian Mujahideen: The Enemy Within (Hachette, 2011) and Himalayan Face-off: Chinese Assertion and Indian Riposte (Hachette, 2014). He was awarded the Chevening-Wolfson Joint Scholarship at Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, UK, in 1998 and participated in the International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) of the US State Department in 2006. He received the Ben Gurion Prize from Israel in 2011 and the K. Subrahmanyam Prize for Strategic Studies in 2015 from the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA). Since 2024, he has hosted Point Blank, Hindustan Times' weekly YouTube show on global geopolitics.

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe