Sign in

Pay Rs 20 lakh to producer, Supreme Court tells Mamata government

A bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud termed the state government’s action as “growing intolerance” over artistic freedom.

Updated on: Apr 12, 2019, 08:13:04 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up the West Bengal government for imposing an unofficial ban on the movie, Bhobhishyoter Bhoot, and directed it to pay Rs 20 lakh to the film’s producer.

The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up the West Bengal government for imposing an unofficial ban on the movie, Bhobhishyoter Bhoot, and directed it to pay Rs 20 lakh to the film’s producer. (Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up the West Bengal government for imposing an unofficial ban on the movie, Bhobhishyoter Bhoot, and directed it to pay Rs 20 lakh to the film’s producer. (Amal KS/HT PHOTO)

A bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud termed the state government’s action as “growing intolerance” over artistic freedom. “Don’t watch a film, don’t turn the pages of the book, don’t hear what’s not music to the ears...but you can’t curb freedom of the others,” held the bench. It said the film’s producer needed to be compensated by the state.

The court also observed that the contemporary events showed how organised groups now pose a threat to freedom of speech and expression. The court order came on a petition filed by Indibily Creative Private Limited, the movie producer. In its submission, the petitioner said the state had indirectly curbed the film’s exhibition. The local police had built pressure on the producer and coerced them to withdraw the film, the court was told.

The film ran into controversy because of its satirical content lampooning political parties.

Admonishing the police for playing an obstructionist’s role, the court said those who disagree have an option to not watch the film. Police cannot act as self-appointed guardians of public morality, said the court.

“If the right of the playwright, artist, musician or actor were to be subjected to popular notions of what is or is not acceptable, the right itself and its guarantee under the Constitution would be rendered illusory,” said the court, adding the purpose of the art is to question and provoke.

  • Bhadra Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Bhadra Sinha

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.