Road rage case: SC reserves verdict on Navjot Singh Sidhu’s plea | punjab | regional takes | Hindustan Times
  • Friday, Jul 20, 2018
  •   °C  
Today in New Delhi, India
Jul 20, 2018-Friday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Road rage case: SC reserves verdict on Navjot Singh Sidhu’s plea

Senior advocate R S Cheema, appearing for Sidhu, said evidence brought on record regarding the cause of death of the victim were “indefinite and contradictory”. He also said that the medical opinion regarding the cause of death of the deceased, Gurnam Singh, was “vague”.

punjab Updated: Apr 19, 2018 09:07 IST
Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India, New Delhi
Road rage case,SC reserves verdict,Navjot Singh Sidhu
A bench comprising Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul reserved the verdict after hearing the arguments. (HT File/Representative image)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on the appeal filed by cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu challenging the Punjab and Haryana high court verdict convicting and sentencing him to three years in jail in a 1988 road rage case.

A bench comprising Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul reserved the verdict after hearing the arguments.

Senior advocate R S Cheema, appearing for Sidhu, said evidence brought on record regarding the cause of death of the victim were “indefinite and contradictory”. He also said that the medical opinion regarding the cause of death of the deceased, Gurnam Singh, was “vague”.

The bench also reserved its verdict on the appeal filed by Rupinder Singh Sandhu, who along with Sidhu was sentenced to three years in jail by the high court in the case.

Sidhu, who had quit BJP and joined Congress days before the Punjab Assembly election last year, had earlier told the bench that the findings of the high court were based on “opinion” and not on medical evidence.

However, the Amarinder Singh government had on April 12 favoured in the top court the high court verdict convicting and awarding the three-year jail term to Sidhu, who is now Punjab’s tourism minister.

The former cricketer had argued that there was “ambiguity” regarding the actual cause of death of Patiala resident Singh. The counsel for the state had earlier told the apex court: “The trial court verdict was rightly set aside by the high court. Accused A1 (Navjot Singh Sidhu) had given fist blow to deceased Gurnam Singh leading to his death through brain haemorrhage.”

The state had argued that the trial court was wrong in its findings that the man had died due to cardiac arrest and not brain haemorrhage.

The counsel for the complainant argued that Sidhu’s sentence should be enhanced as it was a case of murder and the cricketer-turned-politician had deliberately removed keys of the deceased’s car so that he does not get medical assistance.

Sidhu was acquitted of the murder charges by the trial court in September, 1999.

However, the high court had reversed the verdict and held Sidhu and co-accused Sandhu guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder in December, 2006. It had sentenced them to three-year jail and imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh each on the two.

In 2007, the apex court had stayed the conviction of Sidhu and Sandhu in the case, paving the way for him to contest the by-poll for the Amritsar Lok Sabha seat.

As per prosecution case, Sidhu and Sandhu were allegedly present in a Gypsy parked near Sheranwala Gate Crossing in Patiala on December 27, 1988, when Gurnam Singh, Jaswinder Singh and another person were going to the bank to withdraw money for a marriage.

It was alleged that when they reached the crossing, Gurnam Singh, driving a Maruti car, found the Gypsy in the middle of the road and asked the occupants, Sidhu and Sandhu, to remove the vehicle for their passage. This led to heated exchanges.

The police had claimed that Singh was beaten up by Sidhu who later fled the crime scene. The injured was taken to a hospital, where he was declared dead.