Sign in

What Justices Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas said in their dissent on Supreme Court tariff ruling: 'Clearly lawful'

Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor joined Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts in voting to strike down the tariffs.

Updated on: Feb 20, 2026, 21:17:26 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down President Donald Trump's global tariffs in a 6-3 majority.

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Supreme Court justices pose for their group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. (REUTERS)
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Supreme Court justices pose for their group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. (REUTERS)

"[T]he Government reads IEEPA to give the President power to unilaterally impose unbounded tariffs and change them at will. That view would represent a transformative expansion of the President's authority over tariff policy," the ruling said, referring to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Also Read: Trump tariff live updates: US Supreme Court rejects Trump's global tariffs as ruling says ‘exceeded his authority’

How the justices voted

Liberal justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor joined conservative justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts in voting to strike down the tariffs.

Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

"The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy. But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are clearly lawful," Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his dissent.

The ruling did not address whether companies could recover the billions they have already paid in tariffs. Many, including the warehouse chain Costco, have already sought refunds in court. Kavanaugh noted the process could be complicated.

"The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers. But that process is likely to be a ‘mess,’ as was acknowledged at oral argument," he wrote.

Also Read: Why has US Supreme Court struck down Trump's global trade tariffs? A four-point explainer

Justice Clarence Thomas, in his dissent, wrote that “neither statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President."

He added, “The Court has long conveyed to Congress that it may vest the president with large discretion in matters arising out of the execution of statutes relating to trade and commerce with other nations.”

  • Vaishnavi Vaidyanathan
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Vaishnavi Vaidyanathan

    Vaishnavi Vaidyanathan leads the US Desk at Hindustan Times, where she writes, strategises coverage, and ensures quality across all beats. With eight years of experience covering US news for leading publications, she has reported extensively on politics, entertainment, and sports. Vaishnavi holds a graduate degree in English, Journalism, and Psychology, and completed her PG Diploma in Broadcast Journalism from the Manorama School of Communication, where she was awarded the prestigious Mammen Mappillai Award for Best Outgoing Student. She began her career at the International Business Times (US Edition), covering US breaking news, politics, and entertainment. She later joined Opoyi, reporting across all beats, including US sports and trending stories. Prior to Hindustan Times, she served as World Lead at Times Now News, covering comprehensive world news and events. Vaishnavi has expertise in politics, entertainment, and breaking news, and enjoys tackling stories across a wide range of topics. Beyond the newsroom, she is an avid traveller, a foodie who loves exploring new restaurants, and a pop culture enthusiast who enjoys watching latest shows and films. She also enjoys engaging in debates and discussions on Reddit.Read More

Stay updated with US News covering politics, crime, weather, local events, and sports highlights. Get the latest on Donald Trump and American politics along with Horoscope 2026.