Sign in

Bilkis Bano gangrape case: Bombay HC upholds conviction of 11 convicts

Seventeen people, including Bilkis Bano, were attacked in Gujarat on March 3, 2002, in the aftermath of the Godhra train carnage.

Updated on: May 4, 2017, 15:02:19 IST
Hindustan Times, Mumbai | By , Mumbai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Bombay high court upheld on Thursday life sentences for 11 men for gangraping Bilkis Bano during the 2002 anti-Muslim violence and convicted seven people for tampering evidence in one of India’s most high-profile riot cases.

In this file photo, Bilkis Bano can be seen addressing a press conference in New Delhi in January 2008. In the case, the Bombay high court has also set aside the acquittal of six others for tampering with evidence. (File Photo)
In this file photo, Bilkis Bano can be seen addressing a press conference in New Delhi in January 2008. In the case, the Bombay high court has also set aside the acquittal of six others for tampering with evidence. (File Photo)

The court, however, rejected the Central Bureau of Investigation’s appeal to put three of the 11 men to death.

A division bench of justice VK Tahilramani and Mridula Bhatkar also dismissed the defence argument that Bilkis’ testimony was “bogus” and “full of contradictions”.

“The appeal against conviction filed by the 11 convicts is dismissed. The conviction and sentence is upheld,” the HC said.

Bikis was one of 17 people who were attacked by a mob on March 3, 2002 in Gujarat’s Dahod district at the height of violence in the state. Eight people were killed, six reported missing and only three — Bilkis Bano and two family members — survived. Bilkis, then 19, was raped and left for dead by the miscreants,

The case grabbed national headlines in 2003 when the Supreme Court ordered a CBI probe after the National Human Rights Commission backed Bilkis’ petition against a judicial magistrate order closing investigation.

In January 2008, a special court convicted eleven men — Jaswant Nai, Govind Nai, Shailesh Bhatt, Radhyesham Shah, Bipin Chandra Joshi, Kesarbhai Vohania, Pradeep Mordhiya, Bakabhai Vohania, Rajubhai Soni, Mitesh Bhatt, and Ramesh Chandana — for the gang rape of Bilkis and murder of her family members.

The 11 convicts had challenged their conviction in the HC. The CBI also approached the court challenging the acquittal of Gujarat police officers and state hospital doctors on charges of evidence tampering.

The agency also wanted death penalty for Jaswantbai Nai, Govindbhai Nai and Radhesham Shah, saying the three played a significant role in “pre-planning and executing” the entire incident.

“The appeal filed by the prosecution against the acquittal of seven persons (in the case) is allowed. The acquittal is set aside,” the court said.

The bench said the seven persons, which includes five policemen and two doctors, are convicted under sections 218 (not performing their duties) and section 201 (tampering of evidence) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

“We will consider the undergone period in jail of these seven persons as their sentence. But we will impose a fine amount ,” the court said .

The court had reserved judgment on the appeals in November last year, after conducting a day-to-day hearing on both the pleas for about five months.

(With agency inputs)

  • Ayesha Arvind
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ayesha Arvind

    Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More