...
...
Next Story

Opponents of NMC Bill say it will promote quackery

There were several points on which differences have emerged but the most vehemently opposed clause of the bill is Section 32 that gives ‘limited licence to practice medicine at mid-level as community health providers to persons connected with modern scientific medical profession’.

Updated on: Aug 02, 2019 02:38 AM IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

Union health minister Harsh Vardhan hailed the National Medical Commission (NMC) Bill 2019 as revolutionary and a watershed in regulating medical education in the country, but medical professionals were divided, with a section supporting it and others calling it ‘draconian’ and ‘undemocratic’.

Jairam Ramesh, who is a member of Rajya Sabha and part of the standing committee that recommended changes in the Bill, pointed out during the discussion in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday that the controversial section was not a part of the original bill. (HT FILE)
Jairam Ramesh, who is a member of Rajya Sabha and part of the standing committee that recommended changes in the Bill, pointed out during the discussion in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday that the controversial section was not a part of the original bill. (HT FILE)

There were several points on which differences have emerged but the most vehemently opposed clause of the bill is Section 32 that gives ‘limited licence to practice medicine at mid-level as community health providers to persons connected with modern scientific medical profession’. A section of the medical fraternity maintained that it would promote quackery.

“…This is nothing but legalising quackery in India… Who will guarantee that these ‘legalised quacks’ will work in villages only? Limiting the scope of their practice also will be an impractical challenge… will open the floodgates for licencing 3.5 lakhs ‘legalised quacks’. This amounts to ‘licence to kill,” wrote Indian Medical Association to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday.

Jairam Ramesh, who is a member of Rajya Sabha and part of the standing committee that recommended changes in the Bill, pointed out during the discussion in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday that the controversial section was not a part of the original bill that was referred to the parliamentary standing committee for review in January 2018.

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe