Today in New Delhi, India
Jul 19, 2019-Friday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

The ongoing controversy has put a blot on CBI’s reputation

The CBI’s present troubles are a result of the naked ambitions of politically-inclined officers.

columns Updated: Oct 29, 2018 11:10 IST
Shashi Shekhar
Shashi Shekhar
An outside view of the Central Bureau of Investigation headquarters, New Delhi, 2018(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)

At one time, the Supreme Court (SC) had mocked the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), calling it a caged parrot. Who would have thought that the voices of those clashing with each other in this ‘cage’ anointed by the apex court would become so powerful that the protagonists would themselves turn into a spectacle?

The unfolding of events in the aftermath of the clash between the top two officials in the country’s highest investigative agency is unfortunate. It is the first occasion when the CBI has been forced to raid its own office. Agency chief Alok Verma and his deputy Rakesh Asthana were sent on forced leave and their offices sealed. The CBI’s command is now in the hands of senior-most joint director M Nageshwar Rao. His (Rao) record is not beyond reproach. If you were to believe Prashant Bhushan, not just Rao, even the record of the Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC), the person keeping a tab on the CBI, is not without blemish.

So grave is the situation that CBI chief Verma has put his own government and the CVC in the dock. He is calling his deputy Asthana the leader of a gang of extortionists. The Central Vigilance Commission has countered that Verma is not cooperating in the investigation. Asthana has sought a special investigation team under the aegis of the Mumbai High Court. His deputy superintendent of police Devendra Kumar has been taken into custody even as the team investigating him has been dismantled.

In election season, the controversy has handed the Opposition with another instrument to target the government. Allegations are being flung about that this is the byproduct of appointing officers close to the government. It is true that every party has used this method for its own benefit.

The tradition of political interference in the bureaucracy is not new. Let me share a personal experience with you. Many years ago, Bahujan Samaj Party founder Kanshi Ram had set up the Dalit Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti (DS4) with the cooperation of government officials and bureaucrats. My first interaction with him took place in 1982 at the residence of a commissioner-level officer. Those were the days when the bureaucrats wanted to be in the good books of politicians, and maintain their independence at the same time. But looking at the commissioner playing yes-man to Kanshi Ram, I realised that senior bureaucrats were changing their attitude. Here you shouldn’t assume that only Kanshi Ram was responsible for the moral degeneration of the bureaucracy. It was just that he anticipated the undercurrents and chose to back his instincts. That is why when he went on to establish the Bahujan Samaj Party. Within one-and-a-half decades, his disciple Mayawati was ensconced in the seat of power in Lucknow.

During that short meeting in Allahabad, I understood that the day is not far when politics and bureaucracy will be tarred with the same brush. Impartial bureaucrats will be outnumbered and they will have to make do with positions where their talent gathers dust. The epidemic that took root in the senior bureaucracy has now percolated down to junior levels.

Politics has divided it on the basis of caste, region and religion. Its ill-effects are before us. Let me tell you a story. A caste struggle had broken out in a town in Uttar Pradesh around three years ago. The police brought it under control after a lot of struggle. Even a superintendent level officer leading the police contingent became a victim of this violence.

I happened to meet this officer a few days after this. He was naturally in anguish. During a long conversation, he gave me some surprising pieces of information. He said the force had been divided into two groups owing because of two senior leaders of the state. In times of turmoil, the only police personnel who fight along with the seniors were those whose favoured the chief minister was in power. The personnel from the other group created a lot of noise, but could do very little. Filled with rage, the senior officer mentioned the castes of these two groups, but I don’t want to reveal these in the interests of editorial sanctity.

The CBI’s present troubles are a result of the naked ambitions of politically inclined officers.

Now the Supreme Court has given the CVC two weeks to probe this case under the supervision of a retired SC Judge. Meanwhile, interim director Rao has been told to refrain from taking any policy decision. Whatever be the final verdict of the SC, one thing is certain: this controversy has further tarnished the reputation of the already controversial CBI. The nation’s top investigative agency will take some time to recover from this.

Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan

First Published: Oct 29, 2018 11:10 IST