New GEAC role clouds future of GM crops

In a surprise move, the government has divested “Genetic Engineering Approval Committee” (GEAC) of its role as approver of GM crops, such as BT cotton, by changing it to “Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee”.

In a surprise move, the government has divested “Genetic Engineering Approval Committee” (GEAC) of its role as approver of GM crops, such as BT cotton, by changing it to “Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee”.

HT Image

The panel itself had no role in its re-designation and industry watchers say this deepens the uncertainty over India’s highly competitive but fiercely opposed GM crops, pushed by both the public and private sector .

The change was effected through a Gazette notification on July 22, which the HT has viewed. It states: “…for the words Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, wherever they occur, the words, Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee, shall be substituted.”

“We were not consulted. The government took a decision on its own. But we were told our mandate would not change,” GEAC co-chairperson Arjula Reddy told HT.

Key UPA ministers have been sharply divided on GM food crops. Environment minister Jairam Ramesh has advocated caution, while farm minister Sharad Pawar has said meeting the country’s increasing food demands hinged on breakthroughs, such as GM crops.

“We would like the GEAC to remain the approval committee until then. Its statutory powers as a scientific body should not be diluted or transferred to a political authority,” Shanthu Shantaram of the Association for Biotech-led Enterprises said.

Projects awaiting or granted approval, including new variants of Bt cotton, may stall. A key application is from Mahyco-Monsanto Biotech, now ready with its Roundup Ready Flex, a Bt Cotton variety that can survive weedicides, or weed-killing agents.

In February, the Centre had shelved the launch of the country’s first genetically modified food, BT brinjal, after it was cleared by the GEAC.

Groups opposed to GM crops have questioned the GEAC’s impartiality itself in the Supreme Court, a case still pending. However, till it is decided, the court asked the GEAC to continue.