Silkyara report calls for close reading
The pace of construction and targets cannot be at the cost of safety and sustainability — infrastructure actors can’t brazen this out anymore.
The National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation’s summary rejection of an expert panel report on the Silkyara tunnel collapse is telling. Dismissing the findings without a detailed rebuttal signals a certain degree of apathy and disregard for specialist counsel that is crucial to the safety assessment, and planning of infrastructure projects in sensitive terrain, such as the Himalayas.

The Uttarakhand government-appointed panel, tasked with examining the conditions that led to 41 workers getting trapped for 17 days after a portion of the tunnel collapsed in November last year, has pointed out several defects in the planning and design of the project, including the lack of an escape route, an alarm system in case of a crisis, insufficient exploration of geological and hydrological conditions to determine the feasibility of construction and lack of real-time monitoring for deformation and stress formation. Beyond the panel’s findings, the culture of prioritising the pace of construction over safety and durability needs an urgent rethink.

E-Paper

