New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Oct 14, 2019-Monday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

Monday, Oct 14, 2019

For Re 1 TDS mismatch, I-T withheld Vodafone’s Rs 374 cr; court orders refund

The Bombay high court order that came last week was following Vodafone Idea Limited filing two separate petitions seeking expeditious release of two refund amounts pertaining to assessment year 2014-15.

india Updated: Oct 10, 2019 13:59 IST
Kanchan Chaudhari
Kanchan Chaudhari
Hindustan Times, Mumbai
In a major relief for telecom major Vodafone Idea Limited, the Bombay High Court has directed the Income Tax department to refund to the company Rs. 374.26 crore that was withheld for about a year over petty issues.
In a major relief for telecom major Vodafone Idea Limited, the Bombay High Court has directed the Income Tax department to refund to the company Rs. 374.26 crore that was withheld for about a year over petty issues. (Reuters File Photo )
         

In a major relief for telecom major Vodafone Idea Limited, the Bombay High Court has directed the Income Tax department to refund to the company Rs. 374.26 crore that was withheld for about a year over petty issues such as TDS (tax deducted at source) mismatch of Re. 1.

The high court order that came last week was following the telecom firm filing two separate petitions seeking expeditious release of two refund amounts pertaining to assessment year 2014-15. While an assessment order of November 29, 2018 gave rise to refund of Rs. 149.98 crore, by another assessment order of February 25, 2019 yet another amount of Rs. 224.28 crore, deducted by the company’s payers towards excess TDS was ordered to be refunded.

The company complained to the high court that neither of these amounts were released by the income tax department. When the company pursued the matter with department officials they were being told that the amount was being adjusted towards taxes payable by the telecom major under other assessment orders.

It’s counsel pointed out to the high court that two assessment orders gave rise to the refund claim and there was no reason, no authority in law to withhold the amount. The counsel also pointed out that there was no question of adjusting the amount towards pending tax demands for other assessment years, as all the demand orders were either reversed or stayed by appellate authorities. “None of the demands could be adjusted to the refund in question.”

The company also pointed out that at times the department officials cited TDS mismatch of Re. 1, arising out of rounding of figures, as the reason for withholding the refund.

The department, however, took a different stand before the high court.

It’s counsel claimed that the refund could not be processed because of a glitch in the central processing centre’s computer system. The glitch, according to him, occurred because the system did not accept the fact that the other demands were either reversed or stayed.

The stand irked the bench of justice Akil Kureshi and justice SJ Kathawalla. The bench said when material facts were not disputable there was no reason why the company should not get the refund, especially when the department accepted that other tax demands cited by them were not enforceable.

“That being the position, the refund of the petitioner arising out of order of assessment for the year 2014-15 cannot be withheld, that too on the ground of technical difficulty,” said the bench.

The bench said the technical glitch cannot override a correct legal position. “In the present case, the correct legal position is that the petitioner must receive the refund,” said the bench, adding, “Whatever the technical difficulties in releasing the refund l, the department must sort it out and if the technical glitch prevents auto generation of refund, concerned officer must do it manually.”

Taking due note of the fact that this there could large number of such other cases making it difficult to process refund because of the problem, the bench also directed the department to address the larger issue “so that similar disputes do not have to travel to the high court for resolution.”

First Published: Oct 10, 2019 13:59 IST

top news