Sign in

Fresh face-off between Delhi govt and Centre over advertisement spending

The Delhi government has moved the apex court against Centre’s move to regulate state advertisement through its own panel.

Updated on: Aug 16, 2017, 08:07:06 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The AAP government in Delhi has moved the Supreme Court against Centre’s move to regulate state advertisement through its own panel. It has said the three-member committee, formed pursuant to an SC order laying down guidelines regulating the content of government advertisements, does not have territorial jurisdiction over Delhi.

A view of the Supreme Court against an overcast sky. (Sonu Mehta/ HT File Photo)
A view of the Supreme Court against an overcast sky. (Sonu Mehta/ HT File Photo)

The Central government panel last September held the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) had violated the guidelines and exploited the exchequer’s fund to promote Arvind Kejriwal and his party. It had ordered the party to refund the money state had spent on the ads.

The fresh face-off between the two sides comes at a time when the top court is already seized of petitions, challenging the Delhi High Court order declaring the Lieutenant Governor as the administrative head of the Capital. The matter has been referred to a larger bench.

According to Delhi government, the Centre had constituted the committee in April 2016, also empowering it to have a control over the Capital. However, in May a letter was sent to the state, asking it to set-up its own committee.

Three months later, the Centre withdrew its May communiqué and revived the April order for regulating Delhi government ads. As a result, the LG set aside in September Delhi’s notification to constitute its own three-member committee.

Further, it also adjudicated Congress leader Ajay Maken’s complaint, alleging misuse of state funds by AAP for party gains, which Delhi government said the panel was not authorized to act upon.

The Delhi government argued that the panel “fell grossly short of the standard specified by the SC of unimpeachable neutrality and impartiality and did not possess a neutral background”.

Two of its members were drawing financial benefits from the government, the AAP government’s petition alleged.

  • Bhadra Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Bhadra Sinha

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.