Sign in

SC pulls up Ramdev, says must restrain from abusing other systems of medicine

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana took exception to the contents of several advertisements issued by Patanjali ridiculing allopathy and blaming it for deaths and ailments

Updated on: Aug 24, 2022, 07:24:14 IST
By , Hindustan Times, New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Supreme Court on Tuesday pulled up yoga guru Ramdev for deriding doctors and modern medicine when speaking in favour of Patanjali’s ayurvedic products and said he should restrain himself from “abusing” allopathy and other systems.

Yoga guru Ramdev. (PTI)
Yoga guru Ramdev. (PTI)

Issuing notices to the Union government and Patanjali Ayurved on a petition moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA), a bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana took exception to the content of several advertisements issued by Patanjali to ridicule modern systems of medicine, popularly known as allopathy in India, blaming it for deaths and ailments.

“Why should he abuse doctors and other systems of medicine? We respect him because he has propounded yoga. But he cannot criticise other systems. What is the guarantee what he is advocating will cure people of all diseases?” asked the bench, which also included justices CT Ravi Kumar and Hima Kohli.

Advocate Prabhas Bajaj, appearing for IMA, adduced before the bench advertisements in which Patanjali purportedly blamed modern medicine for leading to deaths and incurable diseases, adding that many of these were published during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

“How can he (Ramdev) say all this...accusing all the doctors as if they are killers. Huge advertisements are there in all newspapers,” the CJI said. “He cannot abuse doctors and other systems of medicine. It’s better that he restrain himself from abusing other systems.”

The IMA complained about statements made by Ramdev and Patanjali’s advertisements in newspapers and on TV channels, deriding modern medicine and making several contentious accusations against those practising other systems of medicine.

“Many of these advertisements attribute lakhs of deaths to allopathy and such ads were published during the peak of the second Covid-19 wave,” Bajaj said. “They even claim to have a cure for diabetes and blood pressure in the teeth of Union health ministry’s own guidelines.”

The IMA had lodged complaints with the Ayush ministry, which promotes traditional systems of medicine, he said. The ministry had also agreed that these advertisements were misleading. “Despite agreeing that the ads are misguiding the public, nothing has been done and his smear campaign continues,” said Bajaj.

After hearing IMA, the bench asked solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who was in the court on a separate matter, to accept the notice on behalf of the Centre.

Last week, the Delhi high court chided Ramdev for “misleading the public” with his claims over Covid-19 vaccines, asking him to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims regarding Patanjali product Coronil.

“You are welcome to have your followers and disciples and people who believe you, but don’t mislead the public by saying more than what is official…concern is to save the good name and reputation of Ayurveda. My aim (also) is nobody should be misled against allopathy,” the high court observed on August 17.

The court had made the observation while hearing a suit moved by doctors’ associations, accusing Ramdev of misleading the public by questioning the efficacy of interventions such as Covid-19 vaccinations.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More