Sign in

Six high courts to get new chiefs; 3 names cleared after three months

After withholding the collegium’s recommendations for three months, the government on Friday evening notified their appointments

Updated on: Feb 3, 2024, 09:32:13 IST
By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Union government on Friday notified the appointment of chief justices in six high courts even as three of these recommendations of the collegium remained pending for the last three months.

While the government notified three recommendations made by the collegium on December 27, it left out two others (Getty Images/iStockphoto)
While the government notified three recommendations made by the collegium on December 27, it left out two others (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

The names of justices Ritu Bahri, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and S Vaidyanathan were recommended as chief justices for the high courts of Uttarakhand, Orissa and Meghalaya on November 2. After withholding the collegium’s recommendations for three months, the government on Friday evening notified their appointments.

While Orissa high court was functioning without a full-time chief justice since October 4, the Uttarakhand high court did not have its chief since October 27. The other four high courts have also functioned without their full-time chief justices for over two months each.

Three other names cleared as chief justices for the high courts of Allahabad, Rajasthan and Gauhati are justices Arun Bhansali, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Vijay Bishnoi.These three names were recommended by the collegium, led by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, on December 27.

While the government notified three recommendations made by the collegium on December 27, it left out two others. The collegium had on the same day made the recommendations for appointing justices Sheel Nagu and BR Sarangi as chief justices in the high courts of Punjab and Haryana and Jharkhand respectively. But their names are yet to be cleared. In contrast, the government cleared the name of the new chief justice of Karnataka high court in less than a fortnight. The collegium recommended the appointment of justice PS Dinesh Kumar as the chief justice of Karnataka high court on January 19 and his appointment was notified on January 31.

The memorandum of procedure of appointment (MoP) of high court judges – a guidebook of understanding between the Supreme Court collegium and the central government in matters of appointment and transfer of judges of constitutional courts, lays down that “the Government have, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, decided as a matter of policy to appoint the Chief Justice of all High Courts from outside.” The MoP was framed in 1999 as the standard based on three decisions of the Supreme Court that evolved the collegium system as the selection mechanism for the appointment of judges in India.

The first three judges of the Supreme Court, including the CJI, comprise the collegium that make the recommendation for the appointment of chief justices in high courts.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More