SC's big relief to DMRC, not liable to pay ₹8,000 cr to RInfra's subsidiary
SC's big relief to DMRC, not liable to pay ₹8,000 cr to RInfra's subsidiary
The Supreme Court has overturned its prior ruling that compelled the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to pay an arbitration award of around 8,000 Cr to Reliance Infrastructure's subsidiary, Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL).

In a significant ruling, the top court said there was a "grave miscarriage of justice" in the directive instructing DMRC to honour the arbitration award. Consequently, the court has mandated the refund of all sums previously disbursed.
ALSO READ- Union Cabinet approves two new Delhi Metro corridors
A bench led by chief justice D Y Chandrachud granted permission for the curative plea filed by the DMRC regarding the dismissal of its revision plea against the arbitral award.
The DMRC's appeal and review petitions, contesting the arbitral award demanding it to pay ₹8,000 crore to DAMEPL, were rejected by the Supreme Court. However, after hearing the curative petition, the court reserved its verdict.
DMRC had previously said that it paid ₹1,678.42 crore, part of its total liability of ₹8009.38 crore.
ALSO READ- Deepfake used in video of girls playing Holi inside Delhi metro? DMRC says...
What is the case?
DAMEPL, a subsidiary of RInfra Limited owned by Anil Ambani, expressed concerns about safety in continuing the contract for operating the 22.7km Airport Metro Express line. Consequently, DMRC terminated the contract in October 2012.
An arbitral tribunal awarded DMRC against the consortium of Reliance Energy Ltd (now Reliance Infrastructure) and Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles SA on 11 May 2017. DAMEPL cited DMRC's failure to address defects in the structure supporting the Airport Metro Express line.
The tribunal conducted a thorough investigation and identified 1,551 cracks in 367 girders, with 80 girders having twists ranging from 10 to 20 mm. It concluded that these defects compromised the structure's integrity.
As DMRC did not take effective measures within the 90-day cure period, the tribunal determined that DMRC breached the concession agreement. Subsequently, the case went to Delhi high court and thereafter challenged in Supreme Court.
(Inputs from Utkarsh Anand and Abraham Thomas)
ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

E-Paper


