Sign in

DRDA employees not entitled to rise in retirement age from 58 to 60 years: HC

In a significant judgement, the Allahabad High Court on Thursday ruled that employees of a District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) in Uttar Pradesh were not government servants and hence they were not entitled to a rise in their retirement age from 58 to 60 years unlike those who held civil posts.

Updated on: Aug 19, 2010, 23:50:57 IST
PTI | By , Allahabad
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

In a significant judgement, the Allahabad High Court on Thursday ruled that employees of a District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) in Uttar Pradesh were not government servants and hence they were not entitled to a rise in their retirement age from 58 to 60 years unlike those who held civil posts.

HT Image
HT Image

The order was passed by a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice F I Rebello and Justice A P Sahi while allowing a bunch of special appeals filed by the state government whereby a single judge order of the court was challenged.

The single judge had, while deciding petitions filed by a number of DRDA employees, held that they too were entitled to a rise in their age of superannuation like other government servants and ordered that their retirement age be raised to 60 years.

However, the Division Bench set aside the single judge order observing that DRDA was an agency registered under the Societies Act and hence its employees "not government servants nor they could be said to be holder of civil posts".

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.