Yeddyurappa vs Bhardwaj: Centre, BJP pick sides

The BJP and the Central government today continued their spat over Karnataka Governor H R Bhardwaj's decision to allow the filing of criminal cases and prosecute chief minister B S Yeddyurappa on corruption charges.
HT Image
HT Image
Updated on Jan 22, 2011 04:22 PM IST
Copy Link
Agencies | By, Beijing

The BJP and the Central government continued on Saturday their spat over Karnataka Governor H R Bhardwaj's decision to allow the filing of criminal cases and prosecute chief minister B S Yeddyurappa on corruption charges.

BJP today rubbished contentions of home minister P Chidambaram and Karnataka lokayukta Santosh Hegde on Yeddyurappa's prosecution, saying that as per legal precedents the Governor should have waited for the ongoing investigations to be completed.

Even as Home Minister P Chidambaram and law minister M Veerappa Moily on Saturday supported Bhardwaj for sanctioning prosecution of Yeddyruppa in alleged land scams.

Accusing Bhardwaj of foisting cases against B S Yeddyurappa, BJP chief Nitin Gadkari has said the chief minister has not committed any "illegal act" in allotment of plots even though denotifying land in favour of his son was "immoral" and "not proper."

Commenting on Bhardwaj's decision to sanction prosecution against Yeddyurappa, Gadkari, who is in China on a five-day visit, told the Indian media in Beijing that denotification of land is the privilege of the chief minister, which was exercised by many of Yeddyurappa's predecessors.

"Denotification of land is a privilege and the right of chief minister given by law. Nothing is wrong with it. Before Yeddyurappa, (former chief ministers H D) Kumarasamy, Dharma Singh and S M Krishna exercised it several times. The Governor has not taken action against them because they belonged to Congress Party," he said.

"Only thing is that BJP and I personally feel that denotifying land for his (chief minister's) son, though it is a legal decision, on the ground of morality, I think it is not good. It is not proper and immoral I think...," he said.

If it is illegal why the government has not taken action against the previous chief ministers? he asked.

Gadkari alleged the Governor's decision was politically motivated and that he was working under the directives of Congress.

The BJP demands his recall as he has already crossed the limits, he said.

It is total discrimination, Gadkari said, claiming that many number of cases filed against Yeddyurappa are politically motivated.

"They are misusing the institution of Governor and creating problems for democracy in the country. It is unfortunate that the institution of Governor is diluted in such a way that people have lost faith," he said.

(With PTI and IANS input)

Close Story

Less time to read?

Try Quickreads

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping hosts the 14th Brics Summit via video link in Beijing, on Thursday. (AP)

    China criticises blocs, invites 13 countries to Brics-related event

    Besides the leaders of the Brics countries, China had invited leaders of 13 countries for the event, seen to be Beijing's push to expand the five-member bloc. It was a mix of countries: Algeria, Argentina, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Senegal, Uzbekistan, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Malaysia and Thailand.

  • A girl lays flowers at a makeshift memorial at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. (AFP)

    US Congress passes rare bipartisan gun legislation

    In a rare political and legislative breakthrough, sparked by a surge in mass shootings across the country, the United States Congress, on a broadly bipartisan basis, passed a set of limited gun control measures on Friday. The Congressional push comes even as US Supreme Court limited the right of states to restrict people from carrying guns in public without special permit, striking down a New York law.

  •  (AFP)

    Roe v Wade: US top court ends 50 yrs of federal abortion rights

    In a judgment that will transform America's political, legal and social landscape, the United States' (US) Supreme Court, on Friday, struck down the historic Roe v Wade judgment that had institutionalised abortion-related protections in the country. Minutes after the judgment, Missouri became the first American state to ban abortion. Case and judgment The judgment was triggered by a case which involved a Mississippi legislation that banned abortion beyond 15 weeks.

  • US President Joe Biden addresses the nation at the White House in Washington, DC following the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

    ‘Horrific’, ‘heartbroken’: Biden, Obama, others react to abortion ruling

    Trudeau called the abortion ruling 'sad day for the court and for the country', saying the Supreme Court 'took' right away. “My heart goes out to the millions of American women who are now set to lose their legal right to an abortion. I can't imagine the fear and anger you are feeling right now,” Trudeau wrote on Twitter. Here are some of the reactions on the US Supreme Court ruling.

  • Anti-abortion demonstrators celebrate outside the US Supreme Court as the court rules in the Dobbs v Women’s Health Organization abortion case.

    Abortion access threatened in these US states after Supreme Court ruling

    The US Supreme Court's overturning of America's constitutional right to abortion gives all 50 states the freedom to ban the procedure, with nearly half expected to do so in some form. Idaho provides exceptions for rape or incest but Kentucky only does so if the pregnant woman's life is in danger. Laws in Louisiana could see health professionals jailed for up to ten years for carrying out in abortions. In Missouri, it's 15 years.

Story Saved
Saved Articles
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Saturday, June 25, 2022