Sign in

UPPCL mandates body cameras for inspections, issues SOPs

The SOPs apply to all discoms under UPPCL and cover vigilance teams, departmental teams and joint enforcement squads

Published on: Jan 25, 2026, 07:08:04 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) has issued detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs) mandating the use of body-worn cameras by enforcement personnel during inspection and anti-power theft drives. The move aims to bring transparency, accountability and legal robustness to enforcement actions, a senior UPPCL official said.

(For representation)
(For representation)

The SOPs apply to all discoms under UPPCL and cover vigilance teams, departmental teams and joint enforcement squads engaged in inspections and raids.

The move comes after years of widespread complaints about UPPCL’s enforcement and vigilance teams harassing and extorting power consumers while raiding their premises for power theft.

“We have supplied 300 body-worn cameras, 64 each to Meerut, Agra and Varanasi discoms, 92 to Lucknow discom and 16 to KESCO. No enforcement teams will raid or search any premises without wearing these cameras and follow the SOPs while doing so,” the official said.

Any enforcement action without a functional body-worn camera will not be considered valid. In vigilance-led raids, the vigilance officer will wear the camera, while in departmental inspections, the sub-divisional or authorised officer will do so. In joint raids, the vigilance officer will wear the camera, and in their absence, the designated departmental officer will take charge.

The camera must be switched on immediately upon reaching the inspection site and kept continuously operational until the completion of the checking process. All relevant activities, including inspection of equipment, evidence of power theft or irregularities, and interaction at the premises, must be recorded.

If any power theft or irregularity is detected, details of the seized material and evidence must be captured on camera. In cases where disconnection is carried out after inspection, the entire disconnection process must also be recorded.

The SOPs further state that after completion of the inspection, a copy of the inspection report should be provided to the consumer or their representative. If the consumer refuses to accept the report, the procedure prescribed under the Electricity Act, 2005, including seen documentation at a conspicuous place, must be followed and recorded on camera.

Each body-worn camera has a memory capacity of 128 GB, while servers can support up to 16 cameras with a storage capacity of around 96 hours per device. Recordings are required to be backed up weekly, while server data must be preserved for at least 20 days before transfer to an external storage.

Deletion of any footage will require written approval from the chief engineer (Distribution Area). UPPCL has directed all concerned officers and staff to strictly comply with the SOPs.

  • Brajendra K Parashar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Brajendra K Parashar

    Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.Read More