New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Nov 28, 2020-Saturday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select Country
Select city
ADVERTISEMENT

India needs a uniform law on organ donation

commentpaper Updated: Jul 05, 2016, 12:21 IST
RR Kishore
RR Kishore

There have been several news reports about organ trafficking in India, putting the spotlight on the shortage of donors. Take, for example, kidney transplants. Against the global requirement of about 600,000 each year, only 60,000 are done. In India, of the 150, 000 to 200,000 people who need transplantation, only 3,500 get it.

This scarcity will grow rapidly in the coming years because of an increasing lifespan, rising incidence of end-stage kidney disease, wrong legislative policies, a deficient procurement network, lack of awareness around donation, failure to leave written will/directives, absence of a centralised registry (though New Delhi’s National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation is a start), and inadequate efforts to clone organs.

Presumed consent alone is not a solution to overcome this scarcity. Had it been so, countries such as France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Portugal, Poland, Hungary and Turkey would not have faced organ shortage. As proved by higher cadaveric organ-retrieval rates in Spain, the approach adopted by medical institutions is as important as laws.

Can India’s transplantation law be changed to boost organ donation? Yes, some changes such as making the law central, not provincial, will help. Under Article 246 of the Constitution, public health and hospitals are within the legislative competence of states. Each state has its own laws on organ transplantation. This is not compatible with reality.

There should be a uniform legislative policy to augment organ donations and enforce regulatory mechanisms. Organ transplantation is different from other healthcare activities and the law on this subject should be enacted by the Centre.

Also needed is a centralised regulatory authority to monitor the transplantation procedures, inspect hospitals, and summon the concerned managerial and medical paramedical staff involved in the procedures. The authority constituted under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994 doesn’ t have pan-Indian jurisdiction.

It should be mandatory to report all transplantation s to the central is ed regulatory authority, with details of the donor and the recipient, members of the authorisation committee and the transplantation team. All transplantation s must be registered, which should allot a wait listed number to each registrant.

The surgeon must certify that he/she has personally examined the donor and, on the basis of documents and personal interaction, he/she is satisfied that the donation is altruistic. It should be mandatory for the attending physician or staff to counsel the dying patient and/ or the family to donate and save lives.

There must be a pragmatic procedure to record the will or pass on the message to the authorities concerned the directive of a person who wants to donate organs after death. This will ensure timely retrieval of organs. The existing law relies heavily on consanguineous (relating to or denoting people descended from the same ancestor) proximity as the eligibility for donation. Patients who can not find a match in their family cannot undergo transplantation. Strangers must be encouraged to donate.

The provisions of Section 9(3) of the Act imposing the condition of “affection or attachment towards the recipient or for any other special reason” should be deleted as it is contrary to the spirit of altruism and human solidarity.

RR Kishore is former member­-secretary, rules drafting committee, Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, and chairman, International Committee on Organ Transplantation. The views expressed are personal.

ht epaper

Sign In to continue reading