Sign in

Ishrat case: Guj addl DGP faces imminent arrest

Gujarat's additional DGP PP Pandey faces imminent arrest in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case as the Supreme Court today dismissed his plea for quashing of FIR and protection against an NBW issued against him by a CBI court. HT reports.

Updated on: Jun 11, 2013, 20:28:55 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Gujarat's additional DGP PP Pandey faces imminent arrest in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case as the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed his plea for quashing of FIR and protection against an NBW issued against him by a CBI court.

HT Image
HT Image

While dismissing Pandey’s petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution (which enables a person to directly approach the apex court for protection of fundamental rights), the bench, however, gave him liberty to go to the state high court.

A special CBI court in Gujarat had issued a non-bailable warrant of arrest against Pandey on May 2 for failing to respond to the summons of the probe agency.

Pandey, a 1982-batch IPS officer, was made an accused in the case for providing "so-called crucial intelligence inputs" to fellow policemen that Ishrat and three others were LeT operatives and were on a mission to assassinate chief minister Narendra Modi.

The IPS officer claimed before the SC that he was not involved in any way in the case and that he had just conveyed the information received from the intelligence bureau to the crime branch officials.

A bench of justice Gyan Sudha Misra and justice Madan B Lokur told senior advocate Sekhar Naphade, representing Pandey, that it cannot entertain the plea for quashing of the FIR in a petition under Article 32. It should have been first filed before the HC.

Naphade contended the HC order to Special Investigation Team (SIT) to register the second FIR in the case was “illegal" and “unheard of".

On behalf of the CBI, additional solicitor general Indira Jaising said Pandey was an absconding officer and the court should not entertain his plea.

The SIT lodged an FIR against Pandey and others on December 16, 2011 following directions from the HC on two petitions filed by the mother and father of victims Ishrat and Javed Shaikh respectively.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.