Sign in

SC: Worst has come from us

Admitting a decline in the values of all institutions including the judiciary, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said, "perhaps the worst has come from here (apex court)."

Updated on: Jan 19, 2011, 01:19:00 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Admitting a decline in the values of all institutions including the judiciary, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said, "perhaps the worst has come from here (apex court)."

HT Image
HT Image

During the hearing of an appeal accusing the Madhya Pradesh government of misusing its discretionary power in allotting institutional land, a bench comprising Justice G S Singhvi and Justice A K Ganguly expressed regret over the trend of decline that began within the highest temple of judiciary way back in the 70s.

It concurred with senior advocate Ravi Shankar Prasad that the Supreme Court of today could not be compared with that of the 1950s.

"Yes, the worst has come from here (apex court). It started in the 70s. In 1976 and then again in 1986 when the court allowed discretionary allotments to the President, Prime Minister, ministers and even to the judges," the bench remarked. "And we must accept this," it added candidly.

Article image

This is second time the SC has expressed regret for delivering the 1976 judgement that held a citizen's right to life and liberty could be suspended during the emergency that lasted from June 1975 to March 1977.

The apex court expressed its anguish when Prasad, agreeing with the bench over abuse of discretionary powers by various governments, said there was a decline in the moral values of all pillars of democracy. "There is a decline even of this institution (judiciary)," he contended, adding: "We must, however, trust the inner strength of democracy."

Prasad's made this argument when the bench lambasted at his client, the Madhya Pradesh government, for misusing its discretionary powers. "Every state government now allots land to those who have money or power. Discretionary allotment has become a malaise. It was meant for public good but in the past 50 years we have witnessed its converse," the bench said.

It added the common man who abides by the law always feels he is a fool.

Article image
  • Bhadra Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Bhadra Sinha

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.Read More

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.