Wider impact of churn in Nepal
The primary driver of the dramatic political developments in Nepal — which culminated with Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ taking oath as prime minister (PM) — appears to be personal power calculations
The primary driver of the dramatic political developments in Nepal — which culminated with Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ taking oath as prime minister (PM) — appears to be personal power calculations. The largest pre-poll coalition ruptured after Nepali Congress chief Sher Bahadur Deuba overreached and refused to give up the position of PM, and Prachanda walked into the camp of his friend-turned-foe-turned-friend KP Sharma Oli. Mr Oli agreed to a rotational PMship, but secured the positions of president and speaker, both key roles in a deeply fractured Parliament. That newer outfits such as the Rastriya Swatantra Party, which campaigned on a promise of a new kind of politics but joined the old establishment leaders they had railed against not even two months ago, added to the churn. On paper, this may appear as a far-Left alliance but the public falling out of Prachanda and Mr Oli in 2021 — when the former vowed never to join hands with the latter and backed Mr Deuba for PM — underline that this is a more political than ideological arrangement.

Prachanda and Mr Oli have both previously spouted anti-Indian rhetoric for domestic politicking. But while Prachanda has a pragmatic streak, Mr Oli, who is the power behind the throne, has made ultra-nationalism his signature theme. His government introduced a potentially intractable territorial dispute by pushing a new map that marked Indian territory as that of Nepal, rather than leaving it to diplomatic negotiations. China — which played a key role in bringing the two Communist parties together in 2017 — appears to have played a role again this time. It will gain an upper hand in a country where China-backed projects have stalled in recent months amid apparent signs of a rethink by Mr Deuba on Chinese investment.

E-Paper

